Literature DB >> 19225910

Does stimulus rate matter when performing somatosensory evoked potentials for coma patients?

Lawrence R Robinson1, Paula J Micklesen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether the rate of stimulation for somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) can influence the presence or absence of cortical responses to median nerve stimulation in comatose patients. If so, this could affect how SEPs are performed and interpreted for prognostication in coma. Our objective was to determine how frequently our comatose patients had absent median nerve SEP responses at 3 Hz stimulation, but present responses at 1 Hz stimulation, and to report outcomes of these patients.
METHODS: We reviewed SEP recordings in 639 comatose patients over a 9-year period. All had stimulation at 3 Hz and 1 Hz. This is a retrospective review.
RESULTS: There were seven patients who had absent median nerve SEP responses at 3 Hz stimulation bilaterally, but had present responses at 1 Hz on one or both sides. Six of the seven died. One 16-year-old patient with traumatic brain injury awoke, but had moderate disability.
CONCLUSIONS: Stimulation rate is an important determinant of presence or absence of cortical responses in about 1% of comatose patients. It is unclear whether such patients have a different outcome that those with absent responses at both rates of stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19225910     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-009-9191-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  9 in total

1.  The effects of stimulus rates on the amplitude of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: the developmental change.

Authors:  A Araki; A Takada; A Yasuhara; Y Kobayashi
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 2.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The effects of stimulus rates upon median, ulnar and radial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  M Fujii; T Yamada; M Aihara; Y Kokubun; Y Noguchi; M Matsubara; M H Yeh
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-11

4.  Body cooling may not improve somatosensory pathway function in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L R Robinson; G H Kraft; S S Fitts; V Schneider
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  The effects of stimulus rates on high frequency oscillations of median nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials--direct recording study from the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Eiichirou Urasaki; Tetsuya Genmoto; Naoki Akamatsu; Shin-ichi Wada; Akira Yokota
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma.

Authors:  Lawrence R Robinson; Paula J Micklesen; David L Tirschwell; Henry L Lew
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Early prediction of individual outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  C Madl; G Grimm; L Kramer; W Yeganehfar; F Sterz; B Schneider; A Kranz; B Schneeweiss; K Lenz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-03       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Somatosensory potentials, CSF creatine kinase BB activity, and awakening after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  A L Sherman; D L Tirschwell; P J Micklesen; W T Longstreth; L R Robinson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-02-22       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Systematic review of early prediction of poor outcome in anoxic-ischaemic coma.

Authors:  E G Zandbergen; R J de Haan; C P Stoutenbeek; J H Koelman; A Hijdra
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bilateral loss of cortical SSEP responses is compatible with good outcome after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Andreas Bender; Kaitlen Howell; Marcel Frey; Ansgar Berlis; Markus Naumann; Gernot Buheitel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.849

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.