Literature DB >> 17136532

Altered cortical integration of dual somatosensory input following the cessation of a 20 min period of repetitive muscle activity.

Heidi Haavik Taylor1, B A Murphy.   

Abstract

The adult human central nervous system (CNS) retains its ability to reorganize itself in response to altered afferent input. Intracortical inhibition is thought to play an important role in central motor reorganization. However, the mechanisms responsible for altered cortical sensory maps remain more elusive. The aim of the current study was to investigate changes in the intrinsic inhibitory interactions within the somatosensory system subsequent to a period of repetitive contractions. To achieve this, the dual peripheral nerve stimulation somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) ratio technique was utilized in 14 subjects. SEPs were recorded following median and ulnar nerve stimulation at the wrist (1 ms square wave pulse, 2.47 Hz, 1x motor threshold). SEP ratios were calculated for the N9, N11, N13, P14-18, N20-P25 and P22-N30 peak complexes from SEP amplitudes obtained from simultaneous median and ulnar (MU) stimulation divided by the arithmetic sum of SEPs obtained from individual stimulation of the median (M) and ulnar (U) nerves. There was a significant increase in the MU/M + U ratio for both cortical SEP components following the 20 min repetitive contraction task, i.e. the N20-P25 complex, and the P22-N30 SEP complex. These cortical ratio changes appear to be due to a reduced ability to suppress the dual input, as there was also a significant increase in the amplitude of the MU recordings for the same two cortical SEP peaks (N20-P25 and P22-N30) following the typing task. No changes were observed following a control intervention. The N20 (S1) changes may reflect the mechanism responsible for altering the boundaries of cortical sensory maps, changing the way the CNS perceives and processes information from adjacent body parts. The N30 changes may be related to the intracortical inhibitory changes shown previously with both single and paired pulse TMS. These findings may have implications for understanding the role of the cortex in the initiation of overuse injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17136532     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0755-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  54 in total

1.  N30 and the effect of explorative finger movements: a model of the contribution of the motor cortex to early somatosensory potentials.

Authors:  T D Waberski; H Buchner; M Perkuhn; R Gobbelé; M Wagner; W Kücker; J Silny
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Effects of passive tactile co-activation on median ulnar nerve representation in human SI.

Authors:  B Ziemus; R Huonker; J Haueisen; J Liepert; F Spengler; C Weiller
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-04-27       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Mental movement simulation affects the N30 frontal component of the somatosensory evoked potential.

Authors:  G Cheron; S Borenstein
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

Review 4.  Focal hand dystonia may result from aberrant neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Nancy N Byl
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  2004

5.  Physiological response in the forearm during and after isometric intermittent handgrip.

Authors:  S E Byström; A Kilbom
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

6.  Selectivity of attenuation (i.e., gating) of somatosensory potentials during voluntary movement in humans.

Authors:  M C Tapia; L G Cohen; A Starr
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05

7.  Task-dependent changes of intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  J Liepert; J Classen; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Abnormal central integration of a dual somatosensory input in dystonia. Evidence for sensory overflow.

Authors:  M Tinazzi; A Priori; L Bertolasi; E Frasson; F Mauguière; A Fiaschi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N20 from the prerolandic P22 and N30 components.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; G Cheron
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12

10.  Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. II. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating long-latency activity.

Authors:  T Allison; G McCarthy; C C Wood; P D Williamson; D D Spencer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  15 in total

1.  Selective changes in cerebellar-cortical processing following motor training.

Authors:  H Haavik; B A Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effects of subclinical neck pain on sensorimotor integration following a complex motor pursuit task.

Authors:  Danielle Andrew; Paul Yielder; Heidi Haavik; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interactive effect of acute pain and motor learning acquisition on sensorimotor integration and motor learning outcomes.

Authors:  Erin Dancey; Bernadette Murphy; Danielle Andrew; Paul Yielder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The effect of experimental pain on motor training performance and sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  Erin Dancey; Bernadette Murphy; John Srbely; Paul Yielder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of a single session of spinal manipulation on strength and cortical drive in athletes.

Authors:  Thomas Lykke Christiansen; Imran Khan Niazi; Kelly Holt; Rasmus Wiberg Nedergaard; Jens Duehr; Kathryn Allen; Paul Marshall; Kemal S Türker; Jan Hartvigsen; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The effects of a single session of chiropractic care on strength, cortical drive, and spinal excitability in stroke patients.

Authors:  Kelly Holt; Imran Khan Niazi; Rasmus Wiberg Nedergaard; Jens Duehr; Imran Amjad; Muhammad Shafique; Muhammad Nabeel Anwar; Harrison Ndetan; Kemal S Turker; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Effects of Filter's Class, Cutoff Frequencies, and Independent Component Analysis on the Amplitude of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Recorded from Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Muhammad Samran Navid; Imran Khan Niazi; Dina Lelic; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Investigating the Effects of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation on EEG in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Samran Navid; Imran Khan Niazi; Dina Lelic; Rasmus Bach Nedergaard; Kelly Holt; Imran Amjad; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-27

9.  The functional architecture of S1 during touch observation described with 7 T fMRI.

Authors:  Esther Kuehn; Karsten Mueller; Robert Turner; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  Decrease in short-latency afferent inhibition during corticomotor postexercise depression following repetitive finger movement.

Authors:  Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Ryoki Sasaki; Shinichi Kotan; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.