Literature DB >> 22349498

Dishabituation of laser-evoked EEG responses: dissecting the effect of certain and uncertain changes in stimulus spatial location.

D M Torta1, M Liang, E Valentini, A Mouraux, G D Iannetti.   

Abstract

The repetition of nociceptive stimuli of identical modality, intensity and location at short (1 s) and constant inter-stimulus interval (ISI) determines a strong habituation of the corresponding electroencephalographic (EEG) responses. To understand what determines this response habituation, we (1) examined the effect of introducing a selective change in the spatial location of the repeated stimulus (i.e., without altering its modality, intensity and timing), and (2) dissected the relative contribution of bottom-up, stimulus-driven spatial changes and top-down, cognitive expectations of such a change. Multichannel EEG was recorded while participants received a triplet of stimuli (S1-S2-S3) delivered to the hand dorsum at 1-s ISI. S3 was delivered either to the same hand as S1 and S2 or to the other hand, and participants were either explicitly informed or not informed of the location of S3. We found that, unlike the introduction of a change in the sensory modality of the repeated stimulus (Valentini et al. in J Cogn Neurosci 23:2822-2837, 2011), introducing a change in its spatial location did not produce a significant dishabituation of the laser-evoked N1, N2 and P2 peaks, but only a small amplitude increase following the P2 peak, maximal on the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated hand. Furthermore, the magnitude of the elicited responses was not significantly affected by cognitive expectations. Altogether, these results indicate that bottom-up, stimulus-driven novelty resulting from a change in stimulus spatial location does not revert the habituation caused by repetition suppression, but determines a small increase of neural activity over the contralateral central-parietal cortex, likely reflecting shifts in spatial attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22349498     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3019-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

Review 1.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Non-phase locked electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to CO2 laser skin stimulations may reflect central interactions between A partial partial differential- and C-fibre afferent volleys.

Authors:  A Mouraux; J M Guérit; L Plaghki
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Clinical usefulness of laser-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Rolf-Detlef Treede; Jürgen Lorenz; Ulf Baumgärtner
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 4.  Brain generators of laser-evoked potentials: from dipoles to functional significance.

Authors:  L Garcia-Larrea; M Frot; M Valeriani
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.734

5.  Spatial discrimination thresholds for pain and touch in human hairy skin.

Authors:  T Schlereth; W Magerl; R Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans.

Authors:  J Kekoni; H Hämäläinen; M Saarinen; J Gröhn; K Reinikainen; A Lehtokoski; R Näätänen
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1997-08-22       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Nerve fibre discharges, cerebral potentials and sensations induced by CO2 laser stimulation.

Authors:  B Bromm; R D Treede
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1984

8.  Evoked cerebral responses to noxious thermal stimuli in humans.

Authors:  A Carmon; J Mor; J Goldberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials.

Authors:  Valéry Legrain; Jean-Michel Guérit; Raymond Bruyer; Léon Plaghki
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  The timing of neural activity during shifts of spatial attention.

Authors:  Debora Brignani; Jöran Lepsien; Matthew F S Rushworth; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  11 in total

1.  Functional features of crossmodal mismatch responses.

Authors:  Chen Zhao; Elia Valentini; Li Hu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty.

Authors:  I Ronga; E Valentini; A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Cortical interaction of bilateral inputs is similar for noxious and innocuous stimuli but leads to different perceptual effects.

Authors:  Stéphane Northon; Zoha Deldar; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Thoughts of death modulate psychophysical and cortical responses to threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Elia Valentini; Katharina Koch; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Nociceptive-Evoked Potentials Are Sensitive to Behaviorally Relevant Stimulus Displacements in Egocentric Coordinates.

Authors:  M Moayedi; G Di Stefano; M T Stubbs; B Djeugam; M Liang; G D Iannetti
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-07-11

6.  Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation over the Primary Motor Cortex Induces Plastic Changes in Cortical Nociceptive Processing.

Authors:  Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Naufumi Otsuru; Koya Yamashiro; Hideaki Onishi; Ippei Nojima; Antonio Oliviero
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Habituation of phase-locked local field potentials and gamma-band oscillations recorded from the human insula.

Authors:  Giulia Liberati; Maxime Algoet; Anne Klöcker; Susana Ferrao Santos; Jose Geraldo Ribeiro-Vaz; Christian Raftopoulos; André Mouraux
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Theta burst stimulation applied over primary motor and somatosensory cortices produces analgesia unrelated to the changes in nociceptive event-related potentials.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta; Valéry Legrain; Maxime Algoet; Etienne Olivier; Julie Duque; André Mouraux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Laser-Evoked Vertex Potentials Predict Defensive Motor Actions.

Authors:  M Moayedi; M Liang; A L Sim; L Hu; P Haggard; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The Analgesic Effect of Oxytocin in Humans: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Cross-Over Study Using Laser-Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Y Paloyelis; C Krahé; S Maltezos; S C Williams; M A Howard; A Fotopoulou
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.