Literature DB >> 7501753

Optimistic bias in cancer risk perception: a cross-national study.

K R Fontaine1, S Smith.   

Abstract

Results are presented from a pilot study in which risk perceptions for developing cancer in samples of American and British adults were compared. 61 American and 43 British people estimated the likelihood of cancer happening to themselves and the average person. As a group, participants tended to judge their personal likelihood of developing cancer as less than the average, supporting the presence of an optimistic bias. However, compared to the Americans, British respondents tended to perceive both themselves and the average person to be less likely to develop cancer. There were no gender differences or interactions between the variables. Discussion centered on possible variations between the two countries with respect to perceptions of control and responsibility for one's health status which may account for the findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7501753     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  8 in total

1.  Being 'at-risk' for developing cancer: cognitive representations and psychological outcomes.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Erga Drori; Avi Orr-Urtreger; Eitan Friedman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2008-09-19

2.  Perceived Risk, Optimistic Bias, and United Action: A socio-ecological examination of COVID-19 prevention behaviors among sexual minority men.

Authors:  Sugandha K Gupta; Trey V Dellucci; J L Stewart; Tyrel J Starks
Journal:  Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers       Date:  2021-06

3.  Cancer-Related Risk Perceptions and Beliefs in Texas: Findings from a 2018 Population-Level Survey.

Authors:  Sonia A Cunningham; Robert Yu; Tina Shih; Sharon Giordano; Lorna H McNeill; Ruth Rechis; Susan K Peterson; Paul Cinciripini; Lewis Foxhall; Ernest Hawk; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Spiritual coping, family history, and perceived risk for breast cancer--can we make sense of it?

Authors:  John M Quillin; Donna K McClish; Resa M Jones; Karen Burruss; Joann N Bodurtha
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Socio-Cognitive Determinants of the Mammography Screening Uptake among Iranian Women

Authors:  Mehdi Mirzaei-Alavijeh; Parvaneh Ghorbani; Farzad Jalilian
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-05-26

6.  Characteristics associated with optimistic or pessimistic perception about the probability of contracting COVID-19: A cross-sectional study of Japanese older adults.

Authors:  Yuta Takemura; Koryu Sato; Katsunori Kondo; Naoki Kondo
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-08-07

7.  RiGoR: reporting guidelines to address common sources of bias in risk model development.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Allison Meisner; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Steven G Coca; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2015-01-24

8.  Cancer and cardiovascular-related perceived risk in a diverse cancer center catchment area.

Authors:  Laura C Pinheiro; Orysya Soroka; Dominic Razon; Rosio Ramos; Francesse Antoine; Andrew J Dannenberg; Monika Safford; Stephen J Peterson; Rulla M Tamimi; David M Nanus; Erica Phillips
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.532

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.