Literature DB >> 18807164

Being 'at-risk' for developing cancer: cognitive representations and psychological outcomes.

Shoshana Shiloh1, Erga Drori, Avi Orr-Urtreger, Eitan Friedman.   

Abstract

This study investigated cognitive representations and psychological effects of being 'at-risk' for cancer. Perceived personal risk for cancer and causal attributions for cancer were measured in four groups: women identified as carriers of mutations in breast/ovarian cancer genes BRCA1 BRCA2, habitual smokers, X-ray technicians, and an average-risk group. Despite differences in awareness of their risk status and perceived risk for cancer, the groups did not differ in health anxiety, cancer worry interference, and self-assessed health. Motivated reasoning processes were identified as potential strategies used by individuals at-risk to regulate levels of psychological distress. Evidence for biased risk perceptions and unrealistic optimism were found among smokers, and patterns indicative of self-enhancement through self-assessments and defensive discounting of cancer causal attributions were found in the genetically susceptible group. These findings highlight the role of cognitive representations in adjustment to being at-risk for cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18807164     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-008-9178-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  39 in total

1.  Worry about health in smoking behaviour change.

Authors:  A Dijkstra; J Brosschot
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2003-09

2.  Ionizing radiation--understanding and acceptance.

Authors:  Laurentiu Teodor Mihai; Constantin Milu; Bogdan Voicu; Dan Enachescu
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Sociodemographic, disease status, and illness perceptions predictors of global self-ratings of health and quality of life among those with coronary heart disease--one year follow-up study.

Authors:  Anna-Mari Aalto; Arja R Aro; John Weinman; Monique Heijmans; Kristiina Manderbacka; Marko Elovainio
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: genes, environments, and personal behaviors.

Authors:  Roxanne L Parrott; Kami J Silk; Celeste Condit
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; C Lerman; S M Miller; M Daly; A Masny
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Familial clustering of site-specific cancer risks associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.

Authors:  Sharon Simchoni; Eitan Friedman; Bella Kaufman; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; Avi Orr-Urtreger; Inbal Kedar-Barnes; Ronit Shiri-Sverdlov; Efrat Dagan; Sigal Tsabari; Mordechai Shohat; Raphael Catane; Mary-Claire King; Amnon Lahad; Ephrat Levy-Lahad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Cancer statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  On the use of familial aggregation in population-based case probands for calculating penetrance.

Authors:  Colin B Begg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Genetic counselling for cancer and risk perception.

Authors:  Annika Lidén; Gunilla Berglund; Mats G Hansson; Richard Rosenquist; P O Sjödén; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.089

View more
  11 in total

1.  Personal attributions for melanoma risk in melanoma-affected patients and family members.

Authors:  Jennifer Hay; Marco DiBonaventura; Raymond Baser; Nancy Press; Jeanne Shoveller; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-09-01

Review 2.  The Life Course Perspective: a Guide for Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Rebekah J Hamilton; Nancy A Innella; Dawn T Bounds
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Factors affecting breast cancer patients' need for genetic risk information: From information insufficiency to information need.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Barbara Biesecker; Jennifer Ivanovich; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Margaret Charles; Melanie A Price
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-28

5.  Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Mary Daly; Evelyn Stevens; Dominique Fetzer; Andrea Forman; Lisa Bealin; Christina Rybak; Candace Peterson; Melanie Corbman; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

6.  Beliefs about the causes of breast and colorectal cancer among women in the general population.

Authors:  Catharine Wang; Suzanne M Miller; Brian L Egleston; Jennifer L Hay; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Living With Genetic Vulnerability: a Life Course Perspective.

Authors:  Rebekah J Hamilton; Nancy A Innella; Dawn T Bounds
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Development and initial testing of messages to encourage tuberculosis testing and treatment among Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccinated persons.

Authors:  Joan M Mangan; Sebastian Galindo-Gonzalez; Tracy A Irani
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-02

9.  Development of a communication protocol for telephone disclosure of genetic test results for cancer predisposition.

Authors:  Linda J Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Dominique Fetzer; Andrea Forman; Lisa Bealin; Christina Rybak; Candace Peterson; Melanie Corbman; Julio Albarracin; Evelyn Stevens; Mary B Daly; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-10-29

Review 10.  The utility of Leventhal's model in the analysis of the psycho-behavioral implications of familial cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Roxana Postolica; Magdalena Iorga; Mihaela Savin; Doina Azoicai; Violeta Enea
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.