Literature DB >> 7500460

Patency following microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy: temporal considerations.

G J Matthews1, P N Schlegel, M Goldstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluate the temporal parameters of patency following vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of consecutive and concurrent vasoepididymostomies (100) and vasovasostomies (100) performed by a single surgeon (M. G.) was reviewed.
RESULTS: Patency rates following vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy were 65% and 99%, respectively (p < 0.001). Motile sperm were observed at a mean of 5.8 +/- 0.8 months (standard error) following vasoepididymostomy and 2.1 +/- 0.2 months following vasovasostomy (p < 0.01). Late failure rates were 21% for vasoepididymostomy and 12% for vasovasostomy. Pregnancy rates following vasoepididymostomy and vasovasostomy were 21% and 52%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patency is rapid following vasovasostomy but requires 12 or more months following vasoepididymostomy. Intervention for azoospermia is appropriate 6 months after vasovasostomy and 1 year after vasoepididymostomy. Intraoperative cryopreservation of sperm in men undergoing vasoepididymostomy and postoperatively in all men with motile sperm will maximize fertility options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7500460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

Review 1.  Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility.

Authors:  Natalya A Lopushnyan; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques.

Authors:  Peter T Chan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Predictors of success after bilateral epididymovasostomy performed during vasectomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Sirpi Nackeeran; Udi Blankstein; Joshua T White; Ethan Grober; Sheldon H Marks; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Different intervals between vasectomy and sperm retrieval interfere in the reproductive capacity from vasectomized men.

Authors:  Edson Borges Júnior; Lia Mara Rossi-Ferragut; Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto; Claudia Chagas Rocha; Assumpto Iaconelli Júnior
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Clinical observation of loupe-assisted intussusception vasoepididymostomy in the treatment of obstructive azoospermia (analysis of 49 case reports).

Authors:  Guo-Xi Zhang; Wen-Jun Bai; Ke-Xin Xu; Xiao-Feng Wang; Ji-Chuan Zhu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies.

Authors:  Stéphane Bolduc; Marc Anthony Fischer; Genevieve Deceuninck; Michel Thabet
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Current techniques in microsurgical reversal surgery.

Authors:  Dominick J Carbone; Joseph J Phillips
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.862

9.  Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: An update.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

10.  Preoperative factors influencing postoperative results after vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Yu Seob Shin; Sang Deuk Kim; Jong Kwan Park
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 5.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.