Literature DB >> 19219057

Clinical observation of loupe-assisted intussusception vasoepididymostomy in the treatment of obstructive azoospermia (analysis of 49 case reports).

Guo-Xi Zhang1, Wen-Jun Bai, Ke-Xin Xu, Xiao-Feng Wang, Ji-Chuan Zhu.   

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of loupe-assisted intussusception vasoepididymostomy (VE) in the treatment of epididymal obstructive azoospermia (EOA), we retrospectively analyzed data from 49 patients with EOA who underwent two-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (LIVE) between 2000 and 2007. The data included the surgical method, postoperative motile sperm count per ejaculation, percentage of progressive motile sperm and patency and pregnancy outcomes. There were a total of 49 men undergoing scrotal exploration, and epididymal obstruction was found in all cases. Bilateral or unilateral anastomoses were performed in 40 and 6 men, respectively. The postoperative courses of 42 patients were followed up for more than 6 months, and the courses of 38 patients were followed up for more than 1 year. The overall patency and pregnancy rates were 71.4% and 26.3%, respectively. Moreover, progressive motile sperm was more frequently present in those patients who had undergone anastomosis at cauda than at corpus or caput. Pregnancy was achieved only in those patients who had undergone anastomosis at least on one side of the cauda epididymis. We think that the loupe-assisted method, with a lower overall cost and a simplified surgical procedure, can achieve satisfactory patency outcomes and pregnancy results. Data from this paper also suggest that paternity outcomes occur more frequently after anastomoses at cauda than at corpus or caput.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19219057      PMCID: PMC3735024          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2008.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  26 in total

1.  Loupe-assisted vs microsurgical technique for modified one-layer vasovasostomy: is the microsurgery really better?

Authors:  Ming-Li Hsieh; Hsin Chieh Huang; Yu Chen; Shih Tsung Huang; Phei Lang Chang
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Modified vasoepididymostomy with simultaneous double needle placement, tubulotomy and tubular invagination.

Authors:  J L Marmar
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study of 3 intussusception techniques in rats.

Authors:  Peter T K Chan; Philip S Li; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Investigations into the fertility of epididymal spermatozoa.

Authors:  J M Cummins; M C Orgebin-Crist
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  Sperm maturation in rabbit epididymis.

Authors:  M C Orgebin-Crist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.

Authors:  Stewart McCallum; Philip S Li; Yefim Sheynkin; Li-Ming Su; Peter Chan; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Microscopic vasoepididymostomy: specific microanastomosis to the epididymal tubule.

Authors:  S J Silber
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Stephen Boorjian; Michael Lipkin; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Vasoepididymostomy to the head of the epididymis: recovery of normal spermatozoal motility.

Authors:  S J Silber
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Microsurgery in andrologic urology. I. Refertilization.

Authors:  L V Wagenknecht; H Klosterhalfen; C Schirren
Journal:  J Microsurg       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr
View more
  5 in total

1.  Sperm banking for male reproductive preservation: a 6-year retrospective multi-centre study in China.

Authors:  Ping Ping; Wen-Bing Zhu; Xin-Zong Zhang; Kang-Shou Yao; Peng Xu; Yi-Ran Huang; Zheng Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques.

Authors:  Peter T Chan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  A modified single-armed technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Chun-Hua Deng; Xiang-Zhou Sun; Yu Chen; Wen-Wei Wang; Liang-Yun Zhao; Ling-You Zeng; Xiang-An Tu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Two-suture single-armed longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy for obstructive azoospermia: report of patients characteristics and outcome.

Authors:  Saleh Binsaleh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  A modified single-armed microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for epididymal obstructive azoospermia: intraoperative choice and postoperative consideration.

Authors:  Nachuan Liu; Peng Li; Erlei Zhi; Chencheng Yao; Chao Yang; Liangyu Zhao; Ruhui Tian; Huixing Chen; Yuhua Huang; Yuexin Yu; Zheng Li
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.