Literature DB >> 18488212

Finger force perception during ipsilateral and contralateral force matching tasks.

Woo-Hyung Park1, Charles T Leonard, Sheng Li.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to compare matching performance between ipsilateral and contralateral finger force matching tasks and to examine the effect of handedness on finger force perception. Eleven subjects were instructed to produce reference forces by an instructed finger (index-I or little-L finger) and to reproduce the same amount force by the same or a different finger within the hand (i.e., ipsilateral matching task), or by a finger of the other hand (i.e., contralateral matching task). The results of the ipsilateral and contralateral tasks in the present study commonly showed that (1) the reference and matching forces were matched closely when the two forces were produced by the same or homologous finger(s) such as I/I task; (2) the weaker little finger underestimated the magnitude of reference force of the index finger (I/L task), even with the higher level of effort (relative force), but the two forces were matched when considering total finger forces; (3) the stronger index finger closely matched the reference force of the little finger with the lower level of relative force (i.e., L/I task); (4) when considering the constant errors, I/L tasks showed an underestimation and L/I tasks showed an overestimation compared to I/I tasks. There was no handedness effect during ipsilateral tasks. During the contralateral task, the dominant hand overestimated the force of the non-dominant hand, while the non-dominant hand attempted to match the absolute force of the dominant hand. The overall results support the notion that the absolute, rather than relative, finger force is perceived and reproduced during ipsilateral and contralateral finger force matching tasks, indicating the uniqueness of finger force perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18488212      PMCID: PMC2889908          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1424-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Independent control of the digits: changes in perceived heaviness over a wide range of force.

Authors:  S L Kilbreath; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force.

Authors:  Lynette A Jones; Erin Piateski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of enslaving on perception of finger forces.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Charles T Leonard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Independent digit control: failure to partition perceived heaviness of weights lifted by digits of the human hand.

Authors:  S L Kilbreath; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Sensation of static force in muscles of different length.

Authors:  E Cafarelli; B Bigland-Ritchie
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Effect of fatigue on force sensation.

Authors:  L A Jones; I W Hunter
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Force sensation in isometric contractions: a relative force effect.

Authors:  L A Jones; I W Hunter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The sensation of heaviness after surgical disconnection of the cerebral hemispheres in man.

Authors:  S C Gandevia
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effects of related sensory inputs on motor performances in man studied through changes in perceived heaviness.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  7 in total

1.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of laparoscopic instrument and finger on force perception: a first step towards laparoscopic force-skills training.

Authors:  M S Raghu Prasad; M Manivannan; S M Chandramohan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  No graded responses of finger muscles to TMS during motor imagery of isometric finger forces.

Authors:  Woo-Hyung Park; Sheng Li
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Quantification of perceived exertion during isometric force production with the Borg scale in healthy individuals and patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Stephen Hampton; Gina Armstrong; Monika Shah Ayyar; Sheng Li
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.119

5.  Individuals With Hemiparetic Stroke Accurately Match Torques They Generate About Each Elbow Joint.

Authors:  Ninghe M Cai; Justin M Drogos; Julius P A Dewald; Netta Gurari
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Accuracy of Individuals Post-hemiparetic Stroke in Matching Torques Between Arms Depends on the Arm Referenced.

Authors:  Netta Gurari; Nina A van der Helm; Justin M Drogos; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Test-retest reliability of tip, key, and palmar pinch force sense in healthy adults.

Authors:  Lin Li; Yanxia Li; Changhong Wu; Xinyan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.