Literature DB >> 7489944

The perfect pelvic pouch--what makes the difference?

W G Lewis1, A S Miller, M E Williamson, P M Sagar, P J Holdsworth, A T Axon, D Johnston.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine what factors are important for the achievement of perfect anal continence after restorative proctocolectomy. One hundred patients underwent paired studies of anorectal physiology before and one year after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir (11 S, 25 J, 64 W) with stapled ileoanal anastomosis, without mucosectomy. Fifty seven patients attained perfect anal continence and were able to discriminate flatus from faeces with such confidence that they were able to release flatus safely without fear of faecal soiling. The remaining 43 patients experienced minor problems in this regard. Four factors were found to correlate significantly with a perfect functional result (median, perfect v imperfect): maximum resting anal pressure (72 v 57 cm H2O, p < 0.02), the sensory threshold in the upper and mid-anal canal (7.3 v 8.6 and 5.3 v 7.0 mA, p < 0.05 and p < 0.02), compliance of the ileal reservoir (12.4 v 7.6 ml/cm H2O, p < 0.01), and the presence of a pouch-anal inhibitory reflex (56 of 57 patients v 29 of 43 patients, p < 0.01). The quality of anal continence depends on several factors: a complaint ileal reservoir, a strong sensitive anal sphincter, and normal reflex coordination of the activities of the reservoir and the sphincter. Excellent pouch-anal coordination is obtainable irrespective of the design of the reservoir, provided that these criteria are satisfied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7489944      PMCID: PMC1382909          DOI: 10.1136/gut.37.4.552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  16 in total

1.  THE FUNCTIONAL IMPORTANCE OF THE INTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTER.

Authors:  R C BENNETT; H L DUTHIE
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Anorectal physiology measurement: report of a working party.

Authors:  M R Keighley; M M Henry; D C Bartolo; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Anal sensation after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The critical level for preservation of continence in the ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  L W Martin; A M Torres; J E Fischer; F Alexander
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: a pathophysiological assessment.

Authors:  R J Nicholls; P Belliveau; M Neill; M Wilks; S Tabaqchali
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Enteric continence and the ileal pouch-anal procedure.

Authors:  M E Pezim; J H Pemberton; R R Dozois
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1987

7.  Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  D Johnston; P J Holdsworth; D G Nasmyth; D E Neal; J N Primrose; N Womack; A T Axon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  D G Nasmyth; D Johnston; P G Godwin; M F Dixon; A Smith; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  New method for assessment of anal sensation in various anorectal disorders.

Authors:  A M Roe; D C Bartolo; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Correlation between laboratory findings and clinical outcome after restorative proctocolectomy: serial studies in 20 patients with end-to-end pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  P M Sagar; P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Manfred Nagelschmidt; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; H G Gooszen; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; C J van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Ileoneorectal anastomosis: early clinical results of a restorative procedure for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis without formation of an ileoanal pouch.

Authors:  C J van Laarhoven; G I Andriesse; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The role of pouch compliance measurement in the management of pouch dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasuko Maeda; María Elena Molina; Christine Norton; Simon D McLaughlin; Carolynne J Vaizey; Søren Laurberg; Susan K Clark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Simon P Bach; Neil J Mortensen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Risk of ileal pouch neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Masahiro Tajika; Yasumasa Niwa; Vikram Bhatia; Tsutomu Tanaka; Makoto Ishihara; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.