Literature DB >> 18438676

Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Andreas D Rink1, Manfred Nagelschmidt, Irina Radinski, Karl-Heinz Vestweber.   

Abstract

AIM: The impact of 3-dimensional vector manometry (VM) for characterization of the functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy (RP) was studied in 61 patients at a median of 86 months after RP for ulcerative colitis.
METHODS: A 14-day continence diary was utilized to quantify continence, urgency, and the frequency of defecation. The clinical outcome data were correlated to the physiology parameters of VM and volumetry.
RESULTS: VM parameters at rest correlated with postoperative continence but not substantially with stool frequency and urgency. High radial asymmetry was significantly correlated with the degree of incontinence (r=0.333, p=0.013). Resting pressures demonstrated a better correlation with the degree of incontinence when documented for the high-pressure zone (HPZ; portion of the sphincter with at least 50% of the maximum pressure; r=0.301, p=0.025) and when performed in the continuous pull-through technique. Stool frequency and urgency were better characterized by volumetry parameters like threshold volumes and pouch compliance. The specificity and sensitivity of the vector volume at rest of the HPZ for the prediction of incontinence was 63.6% and 59.1%, respectively. The corresponding values were 67% and 68%, respectively, for radial asymmetry at rest. Stool frequency and urgency were better characterized by volumetry parameters like threshold volumes and pouch compliance.
CONCLUSION: A strong anal sphincter at rest and a consistent radial distribution of the sphincter pressure are the most reliable indicators of continence after RP obtained by VM, but their clinical usefulness is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18438676     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0473-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  40 in total

Review 1.  The results of pouch surgery after ileo-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: the manometric assessment of pouch continence and its reservoir function.

Authors:  M Pescatori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Electrophysiologic assessments in pudendal and sacral motor nerves after ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis for patients with ulcerative colitis and adenomatosis coli.

Authors:  R Tomita; Y Kurosu; K Munakata
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Possible role of the autonomic nervous system in sphincter impairment after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  T Hallgren; S Fasth; D Delbro; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Fecal incontinence in females with a past history of vaginal delivery: significance of anal sphincter defects detected by ultrasound.

Authors:  Henri Damon; Luc Henry; Xavier Barth; François Mion
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Anal canal pressure profile: a reappraisal as determined by rapid pullthrough technique.

Authors:  S M McHugh; N E Diamant
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Fabrizio Michelassi; John Lee; Michele Rubin; Alessandro Fichera; Kristen Kasza; Theodore Karrison; Roger D Hurst
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter.

Authors:  B M Taylor; R W Beart; S F Phillips
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio; Feza H Remzi; Jeff Hammel; James M Church; Tracy L Hull; Anthony J Senagore; Scott A Strong; Ian C Lavery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Recovery of the internal anal sphincter and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  R Farouk; G S Duthie; D C Bartolo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Intraoperative pelvic nerve stimulation performed under continuous electromyography of the internal anal sphincter.

Authors:  Werner Kneist; Daniel W Kauff; Roman K Rahimi Nedjat; Andreas D Rink; Axel Heimann; Karin Somerlik; Klaus P Koch; Thomas Doerge; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  MRI defecography of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-contributes little to the understanding of functional outcome.

Authors:  M L Sunde; A Negård; T Øresland; N Bakka; J T Geitung; A E Færden
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The role of pouch compliance measurement in the management of pouch dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasuko Maeda; María Elena Molina; Christine Norton; Simon D McLaughlin; Carolynne J Vaizey; Søren Laurberg; Susan K Clark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Postoperative changes of manometry after restorative proctocolectomy in Korean ulcerative colitis patients.

Authors:  Se Heon Oh; Yong Sik Yoon; Jong Lyul Lee; Chan Wook Kim; In Ja Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.