Literature DB >> 10615929

Ileoneorectal anastomosis: early clinical results of a restorative procedure for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis without formation of an ileoanal pouch.

C J van Laarhoven1, G I Andriesse, M E Schipper, L M Akkermans, T J van Vroonhoven, H G Gooszen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new surgical procedure, ileoneorectal anastomosis (INRA), in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical treatment in UC and FAP aims to resect diseased colonic mucosa and restore oroanal continuity. The ileopouch anal anastomosis achieves this but has a 15% to 35% complication rate, a 10% failure rate, and an unpredictable functional outcome. An alternative surgical technique, INRA, has been developed in which the rectal mucosa is replaced by a vascularized ileal mucosa graft.
METHODS: Eleven patients underwent an INRA procedure with a temporary diverting ileostomy. Clinical history, repeat endoscopy, histologic examination, and rectal compliance measurements were carried out before and after surgery.
RESULTS: The INRA procedure was technically successful in all patients. Endoscopy showed ingrowth of ileal mucosa in the neorectum, with 100% coverage after 6 weeks. No patient had pelvic sepsis, neorectal-anal or -vaginal fistula, autonomic nerve damage, or fecal incontinence. Neorectal function improved with time. The median 24-hour defecation frequency decreased from 15 (range 9 to 25) to 7 (range 4 to 10) at 11 months follow-up, and the median maximum tolerated volume increased to 157 (range 130 to 225) ml. Anal manometry and electrosensitivity were not affected by the surgery. Histologic biopsy samples after 1 year showed a normal small intestinal mucous membrane, without inflammation or fibrosis.
CONCLUSION: The combination of a low complication rate and good neorectal function at 1 year is a substantial improvement that justifies extension of the clinical application in patients with UC and FAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615929      PMCID: PMC1420938          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199912000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: recent developments].

Authors:  C J van Laarhoven; M E Schipper; T J van Vroonhoven; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1999-03-27

2.  Randomized trial of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  S P Grobler; K B Hosie; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  One-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary defunctioning ileostomy.

Authors:  P M Sagar; W Lewis; P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Restorative proctocolectomy with various types of reservoir.

Authors:  R J Nicholls
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  A G Parks; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-07-08

6.  Comparison of restorative proctocolectomy with and without covering ileostomy in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; P Luukkonen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The ileoanal reservoir.

Authors:  S D Wexner; W D Wong; D A Rothenberger; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Continuing evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure.

Authors:  Z Cohen; R S McLeod; W Stephen; H S Stern; B O'Connor; R Reznick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Update on clinical experience with different surgical techniques of the endorectal pull-through operation for colitis and polyposis.

Authors:  E W Fonkalsrud
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987-10

10.  Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  M R Keighley; K Yoshioka; W Kmiot
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; H G Gooszen; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; C J van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Assessments of anal canal sensitivity in patients with soiling 5 years or more after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita; Seigo Igarashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Sexual function and continence after ileo pouch anal anastomosis: a comparison between a meta-analysis and a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  W E Hueting; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The ileo neo rectal anastomosis: long-term results of surgical innovation in patients after ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Joost T Heikens; Hein G Gooszen; Johannes L J M Teepen; Willem E Hueting; Henk J Oostvogel; Theo J M V van Vroonhoven; J Han J M van Krieken; Cees J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.