Literature DB >> 7489170

Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy.

F P McGinn1, A J Miles, M Uglow, M Ozmen, C Terzi, M Humby.   

Abstract

Three hundred and ten patients having elective cholecystectomy were randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or mini-cholecystectomy. There were 155 patients in each group. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was significantly more common with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 versus 4 per cent) and complications were significantly more frequent with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (9 versus 3 per cent). If laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successful, hospital stay was significantly shorter than for mini-cholecystectomy (2 versus 3 days respectively), but overall the hospital stay was not significantly different. Postoperative analgesia requirements were reduced and return to normal activities and to work were faster after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There was no significant cost difference between the two procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7489170     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800821027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  27 in total

1.  Clinical trials and the development of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  A Ros; L Gustafsson; H Krook; C E Nordgren; A Thorell; G Wallin; E Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  B Jaffray
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study with special reference to obesity.

Authors:  J Harju; P Juvonen; M Eskelinen; P Miettinen; M Pääkkönen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

Authors:  Sanjay Purkayastha; Henry S Tilney; Panagiotis Georgiou; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the other side of the coin.

Authors:  O T Terpstra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-01

7.  Improvement in the quality of life following cholecystectomy: a randomized multicenter study of health status (RAND-36) in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samuli Aspinen; Jari Kärkkäinen; Jukka Harju; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Kokki; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Evaluating new surgical procedures.

Authors:  I Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-11

9.  Evaluating new surgical procedures. Few trials of laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been randomised.

Authors:  F P McGinn; C Terzi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-09

10.  Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Trudy de Jonge; Hein G Gooszen; Erik Buskens; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.