Literature DB >> 11178752

Clinical trials and the development of laparoscopic surgery.

J G Hunter.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11178752     DOI： 10.1007/s004640000385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN： 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.

Authors:  J S Barkun; A N Barkun; J S Sampalis; G Fried; B Taylor; M J Wexler; C A Goresky; J L Meakins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Laparoscopic hernia repair. The socioeconomic tyranny of surgical technology.

Authors:  I M Rutkow
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-11

3.  A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; G Berci; C K McSherry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Johnson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy.

Authors:  F P McGinn; A J Miles; M Uglow; M Ozmen; C Terzi; M Humby
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A W Majeed; G Troy; J P Nicholl; A Smythe; M W Reed; C J Stoddard; J Peacock; A G Johnson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial.

Authors:  A J McMahon; I T Russell; J N Baxter; S Ross; J R Anderson; C G Morran; G Sunderland; D Galloway; G Ramsay; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008.

Authors:  Hossein Masoomi; Steven Mills; Matthew O Dolich; Noor Ketana; Joseph C Carmichael; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Integrating a novel shape memory polymer into surgical meshes decreases placement time in laparoscopic surgery: an in vitro and acute in vivo study.

Authors:  Michael M Zimkowski; Mark E Rentschler; Jonathan Schoen; Bryan A Rech; Nageswara Mandava; Robin Shandas
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Biocompatibility and tissue integration of a novel shape memory surgical mesh for ventral hernia: in vivo animal studies.

Authors:  Michael M Zimkowski; Mark E Rentschler; Jonathan A Schoen; Nageswara Mandava; Robin Shandas
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

Review 5.  Small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.