Literature DB >> 7483311

The functional architecture of human visual motion perception.

Z L Lu1, G Sperling.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A powerful paradigm (the pedestal-plus-test display) is combined with several subsidiary paradigms (interocular presentation, stimulus superpositions with varying phases, and attentional manipulations) to determine the functional architecture of visual motion perception: i.e. the nature of the various mechanisms of motion perception and their relations to each other. Three systems are isolated: a first-order system that uses a primitive motion energy computation to extract motion from moving luminance modulations; a second-order system that uses motion energy to extract motion from moving texture-contrast modulations; and a third-order system that tracks features. Pedestal displays exclude feature-tracking and thereby yield pure measures of the first- and second-order systems which are found to be exclusively monocular. Interocular displays exclude the first- and second-order systems and thereby to yield pure measures of feature-tracking.
RESULTS: both first- and second-order systems are fast (with temporal frequency cutoff at 12 Hz) and sensitive. Feature tracking operates interocularly almost as well as monocularly. It is slower (cutoff frequency is 3 Hz) and it requires much more stimulus contrast than the first- and second-order systems. Feature tracking is both bottom-up (it computes motion from luminance modulation, texture-contrast modulation, depth modulation, motion modulation, flicker modulation, and from other types of stimuli) and top-down--e.g. attentional instructions can determine the direction of perceived motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7483311     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00025-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  74 in total

Review 1.  More than one way to see it move?

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The mechanism of isoluminant chromatic motion perception.

Authors:  Z L Lu; L A Lesmes; G Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Measuring the amplification of attention.

Authors:  E Blaser; G Sperling; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Induced motion at texture-defined motion boundaries.

Authors:  A Johnston; C P Benton; P W McOwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Perceptual motion standstill in rapidly moving chromatic displays.

Authors:  Z L Lu; L A Lesmes; G Sperling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Feature matching and segmentation in motion perception.

Authors:  N E Scott-Samuel; M A Georgeson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The emergence of visual objects in space-time.

Authors:  S Gepshtein; M Kubovy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Asynchronous perception of motion and luminance change.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-07

9.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.