Literature DB >> 10884439

The emergence of visual objects in space-time.

S Gepshtein1, M Kubovy.   

Abstract

It is natural to think that in perceiving dynamic scenes, vision takes a series of snapshots. Motion perception can ensue when the snapshots are different. The snapshot metaphor suggests two questions: (i) How does the visual system put together elements within each snapshot to form objects? This is the spatial grouping problem. (ii) When the snapshots are different, how does the visual system know which element in one snapshot corresponds to which element in the next? This is the temporal grouping problem. The snapshot metaphor is a caricature of the dominant model in the field-the sequential model-according to which spatial and temporal grouping are independent. The model we propose here is an interactive model, according to which the two grouping mechanisms are not separable. Currently, the experiments that support the interactive model are not conclusive because they use stimuli that are excessively specialized. To overcome this weakness, we created a new type of stimulus-spatiotemporal dot lattices-which allow us to independently manipulate the strength of spatial and temporal groupings. For these stimuli, sequential models make one fundamental assumption: if the spatial configuration of the stimulus remains constant, the perception of spatial grouping cannot be affected by manipulations of the temporal configuration of the stimulus. Our data are inconsistent with this assumption.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884439      PMCID: PMC16691          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.8186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Perceptual organization of apparent motion in the Ternus display.

Authors:  Z J He; T L Ooi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception.

Authors:  H R Wilson; V P Ferrera; C Yo
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Object recognition can drive motion perception.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; C Armel; C Foster; R Stoddard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  J H Maunsell; W T Newsome
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 5.  Motion: the long and short of it.

Authors:  P Cavanagh; G Mather
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1989

6.  Optical tearing in spatiotemporal boundary formation: when do local element motions produce boundaries, form, and global motion?

Authors:  T F Shipley; P J Kellman
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1993

7.  Kinetic subjective contours.

Authors:  P J Kellman; M H Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-03

8.  Perceptual organization in moving patterns.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; S M Anstis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Aug 11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion.

Authors:  P Burt; G Sperling
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J A Movshon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Attention and non-retinotopic feature integration.

Authors:  Thomas U Otto; Haluk Öğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization.

Authors:  Johan Wagemans; James H Elder; Michael Kubovy; Stephen E Palmer; Mary A Peterson; Manish Singh; Rüdiger von der Heydt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Attention modulates spatio-temporal grouping.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Michael H Herzog; Haluk Oğmen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Paradoxical perception of object identity in visual motion.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zharikova; Sergei Gepshtein; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Object correspondence: Using perceived causality to infer how the visual system knows what went where.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Teresa Stephens; Elisabeth Hein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Non-rigid illusory contours and global shape transformations defined by spatiotemporal boundary formation.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Yang Z Xing; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Perceptual inference employs intrinsic alpha frequency to resolve perceptual ambiguity.

Authors:  Lu Shen; Biao Han; Lihan Chen; Qi Chen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  What Happens in a Moment.

Authors:  Mark A Elliott; Anne Giersch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.