Literature DB >> 7466295

Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine, II. correlation between forearm BMC and lumbar spine BMC.

B Krølner, S Pors Nielsen, B Lund, B Lund, O H Sørensen, A Uhrenholdt.   

Abstract

A comparison between forearm bone mineral content (BMC) and lumbar BMC was made in post-menopausal women. Women without symptoms, women with clinical spinal osteoporosis, and women with prednisone-treated rheumatoid arthritis were studied. A conventional two-dimensional single-photon osteodensitometer was used for measurement of forearm BMC. A new two-dimensional dual-photon osteodensitometer was used for measurement of lumbar BMC. Its radioactive source was 153Gadolinium. The mean lumbar BMC was significantly reduced in women with clinical spinal osteoporosis (P < 0.001). The mean forearm of BMC of those patients was normal. Thus, forearm BMC was a poor indicator of spinal osteopenia. If forearm BMC was used to predict lumbar BMC erroneously high results were obtained in women with clinical spinal osteoporosis, and erroneously low values were obtained in prednisone-treated women with rheumatoid arthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7466295     DOI: 10.1080/00365518009091979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  14 in total

1.  Comparison between radial bone mineral density measured by single photon absorptiometry and histomorphometric bone mass parameters measured on iliac crest biopsies.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; D Uebelhart; G Boivin; C Edouard; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Effect of calcitonin on total body bone mineral contents of experimental osteoporotic rats determined by dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  K Nakatsuka; Y Nishizawa; S Hagiwara; H Koyama; T Miki; H Ochi; H Morii
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Dual photon absorptiometry of the proximal tibia.

Authors:  M M Checovich; B J Kiratli; E L Smith
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  The reproducibility of single photon absorptiometry in a clinical setting.

Authors:  R Valkema; J A Blokland; S E Papapoulos; O L Bijvoet; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

5.  Physical fitness is a major determinant of femoral neck and lumbar spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Regional and total skeletal measurements in the early postmenopause.

Authors:  J C Stevenson; L M Banks; T J Spinks; C Freemantle; I MacIntyre; R Hesp; G Lane; J A Endacott; M Padwick; M I Whitehead
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine.

Authors:  N von Wowern; T L Storm; K Olgaard
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  A Gotfredsen; B J Riis; C Christiansen; P Rødbro
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Interpretation of lumbar spine densitometry in women with fractures.

Authors:  S P Nielsen; F Hermansen; O Bärenholdt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Premenopausal bone loss: fact or artifact?

Authors:  B J Riis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.