Literature DB >> 2390848

Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip.

A Gotfredsen1, B J Riis, C Christiansen, P Rødbro.   

Abstract

Regional bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) (head, arms, chest, spine, pelvis, legs) of a total body dual photon 153Gd absorptiometry (DPA) scan were measured in 20 healthy postmenopausal women, 27 postmenopausal women with hip fracture, and 17 postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis of the hip. In addition, local BMC and BMD were measured in the proximal and distal regions of the distal forearm (BMCprox, BMDprox, BMCdist, BMDdist) by single photon absorptiometry (SPA); and in the lumbar spine (BMCL2-L4 and BMDL2-L4) by 153Gd DPA. The overall impression was a reduction of bone mass in hip fracture patients compared with healthy controls and an increase in the bone mass of osteoarthritic patients. These results were valid using both regional values of the total body scan, and local forearm and lumbar spine measurements, and statistically significant using one-way analysis of variance. There were, however, also significant within-group between-region differences (one-way analysis of variance), showing that the bone mass of the pelvis and legs in hip fracture patients was more reduced than in the remaining skeleton; in osteoarthritic patients it was not increased but rather unchanged or slightly reduced. The differences between the level of the three local measurements (BMDprox BMDdist BMDL2-L4), on the one hand, and the level of the six regional BMD values, on the other hand, were investigated by the two-way analysis of variance: local measurements = rows; regional values = columns. This analysis showed that none of the three local measurements was statistically better than the other two in predicting the overall level of skeletal bone mass as judged by the six regional values. We conclude that serious osteoporotic bone loss has a generalized nature, however, with a tendency towards lower values in the regions affected by fracture (viz: low bone mass in the legs of femoral neck fracture patients). Osteoarthritis may be associated with a high bone mass in most areas, but low values in the affected regions. Local lumbar spine measurement of bone mass by DPA is not superior to local forearm measurement of bone mass by SPA in predicting the nature of overall osteoporotic or osteoarthritic bone change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2390848     DOI: 10.1007/bf02031968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  53 in total

1.  Representativity of regional to total bone mineral in healthy subjects and 'anticonvulsive treated' epileptic patients. Measurements by single and dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Gotfredsen; J Borg; L Nilas; L Tjellesen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.686

2.  Errors in longitudinal measurements of bone mineral: effect of source strength in single and dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  W L Dunn; S H Kan; H W Wahner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Bone composition in the distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; H Nørgaard; J Pødenphant; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.713

4.  Rates of bone loss in normal women: evidence of accelerated trabecular bone loss after the menopause.

Authors:  L Nilas; C Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.686

5.  Prediction of rapid bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  C Christiansen; B J Riis; P Rødbro
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Relationship between local and total bone mass in osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Manzke; C H Chesnut; J E Wergedal; D J Baylink; W B Nelp
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 8.694

7.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Pødenphant; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Limitations of forearm bone densitometry as an index of vertebral or femoral neck osteopenia.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl; B G Wren
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Discriminative ability of total body bone-mineral measured by dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Gotfredsen; J Pødenphant; L Nilas; C Christiansen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.713

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Bone mass in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L D Hordon; V Wright; M A Smith
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Bone mineral density in patients with destructive arthrosis of the hip joint.

Authors:  Kunihiko Okano; Kiyoshi Aoyagi; Hiroshi Enomoto; Makoto Osaki; Ko Chiba; Kazumasa Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Asymmetrical hip bone density in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Rebecca D Larson; Lesley J White
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2011

4.  Bone mineral density is not related to heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kunihiko Okano; Kiyoshi Aoyagi; Makoto Osaki; Satoru Motokawa; Tomoko Matsumoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Bone mineral density in Chinese elderly women with hip fracture.

Authors:  R S Yang; T K Liu; F J Dorey; P U Chieng
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Bone mineral densities in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  K Okano; M Ito; K Aoyagi; S Motokawa; H Shindo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Franck; M Munz; M Scherrer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement with fan-beam design: effect of osteophytic calcifications on lateral and anteroposterior spine BMD.

Authors:  H Franck; M Munz; M Scherrer; H v Lilienfeld-Toal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Differences in bone mineral density between the right and left hips in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Hwang; Si Young Park; Soon Hyuck Lee; Seung Bum Han; Kyung Han Ro
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Spatial links between subchondral bone architectural features and cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritic joints.

Authors:  Sara Ajami; Behzad Javaheri; Y-M Chang; Nimalan Maruthainar; Tahir Khan; James Donaldson; Andrew A Pitsillides; Chaozong Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.