Literature DB >> 7438625

Treatment of nondisplaced fractures of the femoral neck.

G Bentley.   

Abstract

In all the reported series of impacted femoral neck fractures treated conservatively the incidence of disimpaction is between 8% and 15%. It is impossible at the time the patient presents to predict which fractures will undergo disimpaction. Disimpaction requires a secondary operation to prevent nonunion and subsequent disability. Internal fixation is, therefore, considered the most satisfactory treatment of an impacted fracture in every case. This will add certainty to an already stable situation and allow immediate weight-bearing without concern for stability of the fracture. If elementary precautions are taken during operation, disimpaction will not occur. No attempt should be made to improve the position of a markedly valgus fracture in an attempt to prevent subsequent avascular necrosis since this can result in conversion of the fracture to an unstable one. The internal fixation of impacted fractures may be by use of a Smith-Petersen nail, by Moore pins or preferably by a screw of the Garden type. This has the advantage of not separating the fracture during insertion and secures firm fixation of the fragments. The operation is short and simple, particularly when an image intensifier is employed, and the patient may begin weight-bearing on the day following operation and return home after a few days. There is no higher risk of avascular necrosis after internal fixation than after conservative treatment, provided the nail or screw is placed in the center of the femoral head. Conservative treatment is indicated only for those patients who present with an impacted femoral neck fracture several weeks after their injury and are walking without pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7438625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  12 in total

Review 1.  The pathogenesis and treatment of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Lips; K J Obrant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  [Nondisplaced (impacted) femoral neck fracture--conservative or surgical treatment?].

Authors:  J Manninger; G Kazár; T Salacz; A Varga
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1990-06

Review 3.  [Procedural organisation: surgical and anaesthesiological management in hip fractures].

Authors:  Ernst J Müller; Ingeborg Gerstorfer; Peter Dovjak; Bernhard Iglseder; Georg Pinter; Walter Müller; Katharina Pils; Peter Mikosch; Michaela Zmaritz; Monique Weissenberger-Leduc; Markus Gosch; Heinrich W Thaler
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-11-08

4.  Surgical procedures in femoral neck fractures in Finland: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2011.

Authors:  Markus T Hongisto; Harri Pihlajamäki; Seppo Niemi; Maria Nuotio; Pekka Kannus; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Revision surgery occurs frequently after percutaneous fixation of stable femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Michael S Kain; Andrew J Marcantonio; Richard Iorio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Impacted femoral neck fractures].

Authors:  J Riedl; R Kadletz; P Wanitschek
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1989-04

Review 7.  Classifications in Brief: Garden Classification of Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Jillian M Kazley; Samik Banerjee; Mostafa M Abousayed; Andrew J Rosenbaum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Fixation of subcapital femoral osteotomies by poly-L-lactic acid pins. An experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  J Vasenius; O Laitinen; T Pohjonen; S Vainionpää; P Törmälä; P Rokkanen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Undisplaced femoral neck fracture in the elderly.

Authors:  F Y Chiu; W H Lo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Femoral neck fracture fixation: rigidity of five techniques compared.

Authors:  A C Mackechnie-Jarvis
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 18.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.