Literature DB >> 7413417

The use of a visual mask may seriously confound your experiment.

C W Eriksen.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1980        PMID： 7413417     DOI： 10.3758/bf03204322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Do noise masks terminate target processing?

Authors:  D W Schultz; C W Eriksen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-01

2.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Bjork; J Thomas Murray
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors.

Authors:  G C Gilmore; H Hersh; A Caramazza; J Griffin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-05

4.  On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.

Authors:  M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking.

Authors:  T J Spencer; R Shuntich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-08

6.  Figural relationship effects and mechanisms of visual masking.

Authors:  J B Hellige; D A Walsh; V W Lawrence; M Prasse
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Visual masking: mechanisms and theories.

Authors:  G Felsten; G S Wasserman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Interference in letter identification: a test of feature-specific inhibition.

Authors:  J L Santee; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-04
  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention.

Authors:  H W Kwak; D Dagenbach; H Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-05

2.  The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

3.  Switching or sharing in dual-task line-length discrimination?

Authors:  J Miller; A M Bonnel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-10

4.  On the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  F M Marchetti; D J Mewhort
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

Review 5.  Alphabetic letter identification: effects of perceivability, similarity, and bias.

Authors:  Shane T Mueller; Christoph T Weidemann
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-10-26

6.  Providing a sensory basis for models of visual information acquisition.

Authors:  G R Loftus; T A Busey; J W Senders
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-10

7.  Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance.

Authors:  R De Jong; J B Sweet
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-02

8.  The word without the tachistoscope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; B Silvers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

9.  Null effects of exposure duration and heterogeneity of difference on the same-different disparity in letter matching.

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

10.  Word superiority over isolated letters: the neglected case of forward masking.

Authors:  T R Jordan; K M Bevan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.