Literature DB >> 528933

Figural relationship effects and mechanisms of visual masking.

J B Hellige, D A Walsh, V W Lawrence, M Prasse.   

Abstract

In each of three visual pattern masking experiments, four curved letters (C, O, Q, S) and four angular letters (E, I, L, T) served as targets preceded or followed by either a curved mask (Q,S, and C superimposed) or an angular mask (T and E superimposed). With a dark fixation and interstimulus interval field and target-mask engergies that produce clearly identifiable targets, the following figural relationship effects were found. At stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) from 0 to 20 msec (in both forward and backward masking), target recognition was more accurate when targets and masks overlapped exactly (same features) than when they did not (different features). At backward masking SOAs beyond 20 msec, this pattern was reversed, but there was no such reversal in forward masking. Such results indicate that the dominant mechanism of masking at SOAs from 0 to 20 msec is luminance summation over time but that luminance summation gives way to feature-specific interference at longer SOAs. Subsequent experiments demonstrate that (a) luminance summation effects are reduced by using bright fixation and interstimulus fields and (b) feature-specific interference is eliminated by using low-energy (and, therefore, less than perfectly identifiable) targets and masks.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 528933     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Testing quantitative models of backward masking.

Authors:  Gregory Francis; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  The attentional blink is not a unitary phenomenon.

Authors:  Jun-ichiro Kawahara; James T Enns; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-13

3.  Central sources of visual masking: indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance.

Authors:  C F Michaels; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1979

4.  Effects of test-mask similarity on forward and backward masking of patterns by patterns.

Authors:  T Oyama; T Watanabe; M Funakawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1983

5.  The process of perceptual retouch: nonspecific afferent activation dynamics in explaining visual masking.

Authors:  T Bachmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01

6.  Independence versus interference in the perceptual processing of letters.

Authors:  J L Santee; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-02

7.  The use of a visual mask may seriously confound your experiment.

Authors:  C W Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

8.  Visual backward masking: Modeling spatial and temporal aspects.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Udo Ernst
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

Review 9.  Probing feedforward and feedback contributions to awareness with visual masking and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.