Literature DB >> 21331873

Do noise masks terminate target processing?

D W Schultz1, C W Eriksen.   

Abstract

Much recent research in visual information processing has employed a methodology resting on the assumption that a noise mask following presentation of a target stimulus terminates processing of that target. In the absence of appropriate controls, such a methodology is viable only insofar as an erasure theory of masking is valid. However, the phenomena from which the erasure position has derived its strongest support have been subject to alternative theoretical explanations, the most general of which is that of temporal integration. The experiment reported here tested these alternatives. Twelve subjects served in a tachistoscopic study designed to determine whether the same noise field of dots could either erase a degraded target digit or facilitate target identification through temporal integration, under both forward and backward masking paradigms. This was found to be the case, and the results were interpreted as consistent with an integration theory of masking and as incompatible with an erasure conception. The results suggested that efforts to control target processing time through display of a visual noise pattern subsequent to target presentation are methodologically inadequate when devoid of some basic control operations.

Year:  1977        PMID: 21331873     DOI: 10.3758/BF03209198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

1.  THE TIME-INTENSITY RELATION IN VISUAL PERCEPTION AS A FUNCTION OF OBSERVER'S TASK.

Authors:  D KAHNEMAN; J NORMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-09

2.  Neural theories of simple visual discriminations.

Authors:  H R BLACKWELL
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1963-01

3.  Sensory traces versus the psychological moment in the temporal organization of form.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J F Collins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

4.  Evidence for an integration theory of visual masking.

Authors:  M Coltheart; B Arthur
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking.

Authors:  T J Spencer; R Shuntich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-08

6.  Masking phenomena and time-intensity reciprocity for form.

Authors:  D L Schurman; C W Eriksen; J Rohrbaugh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-10

7.  Exposure duration and effective figure-ground contrast.

Authors:  D Kahneman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Temporal summation in an acuity task at different energy levels. A study of the determinants of summation.

Authors:  D Kahneman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Critical duration for the resolution of form: centrally or peripherally determined?

Authors:  D Kahneman; J Norman; M Kubovy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-03

10.  Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; J F Collins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-08
View more
  10 in total

1.  Effect of backward masking on same-different judgments.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-04

2.  Vibrotactile masking: temporal integration, persistence, and strengths of representations.

Authors:  P M Evans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

3.  The locus of the experimental effects in the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task.

Authors:  D C Mitchell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-02

4.  The process of perceptual retouch: nonspecific afferent activation dynamics in explaining visual masking.

Authors:  T Bachmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01

5.  Null effects of exposure duration and heterogeneity of difference on the same-different disparity in letter matching.

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

6.  Independence versus interference in the perceptual processing of letters.

Authors:  J L Santee; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-02

7.  Selective reduction in visibility of a posttarget by an identical pretarget masked by noise.

Authors:  T Morotomi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

8.  Visual imagery in backward masking.

Authors:  A Reeves
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-08

9.  The use of a visual mask may seriously confound your experiment.

Authors:  C W Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

10.  An analysis of visual masking, with a defense of 'Stopped Processing'.

Authors:  Adam Reeves
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.