Literature DB >> 7402695

Use of the McGill pain questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain: replicability and consistency.

Charles Graham1, Susan S Bond, Mary M Gerkovich, Mary R Cook.   

Abstract

The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is a recent empirically derived instrument designed to provide quantitative information on major dimensions of pain. Although widely used as an outcome measure in clinical research, little attention has been directed specifically at the instrument itself. The present study addressed this need. Detailed findings were obtained for both single and multiple administrations of the MPQ in two subject samples, each composed of 18 cancer outpatients in pain. These data were compared to similar, but less extensive, data reported by Melzack [6]. MPQ indices proved highly replicable over the two subject samples tested and were remarkably similar to the findings reported by Melzack for a different cancer pain patient sample. No differences were found between the written form of MPQ administration used in the present study and the oral procedure followed by Melzack. The consistency of pain descriptor subclass choice in the present samples was high, ranging from 66% to 80.4% over 4 administrations, and these values compare well with the value of 70.3% reported earlier by Melzack. However, the present subjects selected a larger set of pain descriptor words compared to the word set reported to be characteristic of cancer pain by Dubuisson and Melzack [2]. Both individual and group analyses indicated the MPQ is best used as a measure of immediate pain, and not as a summary measure of past pain over a defined period of time. These findings support the use of the MPQ as a reliable, multi-dimensional measure of immediate pain, and suggest the potential value of future research aimed at refining the psychometric properties of the instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7402695     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90081-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  28 in total

1.  Differences in pain location, intensity, and quality by pain pattern in outpatients with cancer.

Authors:  Srisuda Ngamkham; Janean E Holden; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 2.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire as a multidimensional measure in people with cancer: an integrative review.

Authors:  Srisuda Ngamkham; Catherine Vincent; Lorna Finnegan; Janean E Holden; Zaijie Jim Wang; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.929

3.  The multiple benefits of minimally invasive spinal surgery: results comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Angela R Starkweather; Linda Witek-Janusek; Russ P Nockels; Jonna Peterson; Herb L Mathews
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.230

4.  Pain Quality by Location in Outpatients with Cancer.

Authors:  Judith M Schlaeger; Li-Chueh Weng; Hsiu-Li Huang; Hsiu-Hsin Tsai; Miho Takayama; Srisuda Ngamkham; Yingwei Yao; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 1.929

5.  Nociceptive and neuropathic pain in patients with lung cancer: a comparison of pain quality descriptors.

Authors:  D J Wilkie; H Y Huang; N Reilly; K C Cain
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Simple pain relief score by observers (PRSO) for assessing chronic pain.

Authors:  S Aida; M Tomita; C Lee; S Fukuda; K Shimoji
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  A phase 2 study of high-activity 186Re-HEDP with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant in progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone.

Authors:  J M O'Sullivan; A R Norman; V R McCready; G Flux; F M Buffa; B Johnson; J Coffey; G Cook; J Treleaven; A Horwich; R A Huddart; C C Parker; D P Dearnaley
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Development of a novel location-based assessment of sensory symptoms in cancer patients: preliminary reliability and validity assessment.

Authors:  Adam R Burkey; Peter A Kanetsky
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 9.  A critical review of dimension-specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research.

Authors:  M J Naughton; I Wiklund
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Assessment of cancer pain: a continuous challenge.

Authors:  S A Grossman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.