PURPOSE: We investigated the potential for improvement in disease control by use of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) to permit administration of high activities of (186)Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) in patients with progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive HRPC metastatic to bone, good performance status and minimal soft tissue disease. Patients received 5,000 MBq of (186)Re-HEDP i.v., followed 14 days later by PBSCT. Response was assessed using PSA, survival, pain scores and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years (range 50-77) and a median PSA of 57 ng/ml (range 4-3,628) received a median activity of 4,978 MBq (186)Re-HEDP (range 4,770-5,100 MBq). The most serious toxicity was short-lived grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 8 (21%) patients. The median survival of the group is 21 months (95%CI 18-24 months) with Kaplan-Meier estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates of 83% and 40% respectively. Thirty-one patients (81%, 95% CI 66-90%) had stable or reduced PSA levels 3 months post therapy while 11 (29%, 95% CI 15-49%) had PSA reductions of >50% lasting >4 weeks. Quality of life measures were stable or improved in 27 (66%) at 3 months. CONCLUSION: We have shown that it is feasible and safe to deliver high-activity radioisotope therapy with PBSCT to men with metastatic HRPC. Response rates and survival data are encouraging; however, further research is needed to define optimal role of this treatment approach.
PURPOSE: We investigated the potential for improvement in disease control by use of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) to permit administration of high activities of (186)Re-hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) in patients with progressive hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Eligible patients had progressive HRPC metastatic to bone, good performance status and minimal soft tissue disease. Patients received 5,000 MBq of (186)Re-HEDP i.v., followed 14 days later by PBSCT. Response was assessed using PSA, survival, pain scores and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years (range 50-77) and a median PSA of 57 ng/ml (range 4-3,628) received a median activity of 4,978 MBq (186)Re-HEDP (range 4,770-5,100 MBq). The most serious toxicity was short-lived grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 8 (21%) patients. The median survival of the group is 21 months (95%CI 18-24 months) with Kaplan-Meier estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates of 83% and 40% respectively. Thirty-one patients (81%, 95% CI 66-90%) had stable or reduced PSA levels 3 months post therapy while 11 (29%, 95% CI 15-49%) had PSA reductions of >50% lasting >4 weeks. Quality of life measures were stable or improved in 27 (66%) at 3 months. CONCLUSION: We have shown that it is feasible and safe to deliver high-activity radioisotope therapy with PBSCT to men with metastatic HRPC. Response rates and survival data are encouraging; however, further research is needed to define optimal role of this treatment approach.
Authors: H R Maxon; L E Schroder; V S Hertzberg; S R Thomas; E E Englaro; R Samaratunga; H Smith; J S Moulton; C C Williams; G J Ehrhardt Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1991-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A T Porter; A J McEwan; J E Powe; R Reid; D G McGowan; H Lukka; J R Sathyanarayana; V N Yakemchuk; G M Thomas; L E Erlich Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1993-04-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J M de Klerk; A D van het Schip; B A Zonnenberg; A van Dijk; M P Stokkel; S H Han; G H Blijham; P P van Rijk Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: David P Dearnaley; Matthew R Sydes; Malcolm D Mason; Mark Stott; Christopher S Powell; Anne C R Robinson; Peter M Thompson; Leslie E Moffat; Sharon L Naylor; Mahesh K B Parmar Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Joyce M van Dodewaard-de Jong; John M H de Klerk; Haiko J Bloemendal; Bart P J van Bezooijen; Marie J de Haas; Richard H Wilson; Joe M O'Sullivan Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah J Chittenden; David P Dearnaley; Antigoni Divoli; Joe M O'Sullivan; V Ralph McCready; Bernadette Johnson; Yong Du; Glenn D Flux Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah J Chittenden; V Ralph McCready; Antigoni Divoli; David P Dearnaley; Joe M O'Sullivan; Bernadette Johnson; Glenn D Flux Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah J Chittenden; Iain Murray; Antigoni Divoli; V Ralph McCready; David P Dearnaley; Joe M O'Sullivan; Bernadette Johnson; Glenn D Flux Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah J Chittenden; David P Dearnaley; Antigoni Divoli; Joe M O'Sullivan; V Ralph McCready; Bernadette Johnson; Yong Du; Glenn D Flux Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Eddie Thara; Tanya B Dorff; Monica Averia-Suboc; Michael Luther; Mary E Reed; Jacek K Pinski; David I Quinn Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 6.639