Literature DB >> 23839679

Simple pain relief score by observers (PRSO) for assessing chronic pain.

S Aida1, M Tomita, C Lee, S Fukuda, K Shimoji.   

Abstract

In 56 patients with severe chronic pain, pain relief was evaluated by observation of changes in activities of daily life (ADL), drug intake, and patients' mood. The degree of pain relief was scored on the basis of these evaluations by a pain clinic physician, a nurse, and a member of the patient's family. The resulting score was termed "pain relief score by observers" (PRSO). Subjective pain relief was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Although a significant correlation (rS=0.755,P<0.001) was demonstrated between the mean PRSO and VAS values, there was some dissociation between the two values in patients with underlying personal problems such as compensation lawsuits or job loss. The results suggest that an objective evaluation of pain relief is possible by PRSO alone without subjective assessment, and that PRSO can be used for patients with various types of pain. Combined assessment of pain relief by the VAS and PRSO methods may be useful to detect the influence of personal background factors in patients with chronic pain.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 23839679     DOI: 10.1007/BF02480069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  21 in total

1.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Personality changes associated with reduction of pain.

Authors:  Richard A Sternbach; Gretchen Timmermans
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  The interrelation of personality and postoperative factors.

Authors:  P Boyle; G D Parbrook
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain.

Authors:  M W Heft; S R Parker
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  A comparison of three ways of measuring pain.

Authors:  A J Frank; J M Moll; J F Hort
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1982-11

6.  Behavioral assessment and treatment of chronic pain: current status and future directions.

Authors:  F J Keefe
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1982-12

7.  Problems related to dorsal root entry zone lesions.

Authors:  Y Kumagai; K Shimoji; T Honma; S Uchiyama; B Ishijima; T Hokari; H Fujioka; S Fukuda; E Ohama
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Pain measurement: an overview.

Authors:  C R Chapman; K L Casey; R Dubner; K M Foley; R H Gracely; A E Reading
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Nurses' assessment of postoperative patients' pain.

Authors:  Margarete Lieb Zalon
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  R L Daut; C S Cleeland; R C Flanery
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.961

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.