Literature DB >> 18330408

The multiple benefits of minimally invasive spinal surgery: results comparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar fusion.

Angela R Starkweather1, Linda Witek-Janusek, Russ P Nockels, Jonna Peterson, Herb L Mathews.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) offers equivalent postoperative fusion rates compared to posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) and minimizes the amount of iatrogenic injury to the spinal muscles. The objective of this study was to examine the difference in pain perception, stress, mood disturbance, quality of life, and immunological indices throughout the perioperative course among patients undergoing TLIF and PLF. A prospective, nonrandomized descriptive design was used to evaluate these measures among patients undergoing TLIF (n = 17) or PLF (n = 18) at 1 week prior to surgery (T1), the day of surgery (T2), 24 hours postoperatively (T3), and 6 weeks postoperatively (T4). Among TLIF patients, pain, stress, fatigue, and mood disturbance were significantly decreased at the 6-week followup visit (T4) compared to patients who underwent PLF. The TLIF group also demonstrated significantly higher levels (near baseline) of CD8 cells at T4 than the PLF group. Interleukin-6 levels were significantly higher in the TLIF group as well, which may be an indicator of ongoing nerve regeneration and healing. Knowledge concerning the effect of pain and the psychological experience on immunity among individuals undergoing spinal fusion can help nurses tailor interventions to improve outcomes, regardless of the approach used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18330408      PMCID: PMC3714401     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs        ISSN: 0888-0395            Impact factor:   1.230


  32 in total

1.  The effects of biofeedback-assisted relaxation on cell-mediated immunity, cortisol, and white blood cell count in healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  A McGrady; P Conran; D Dickey; D Garman; E Farris; C Schumann-Brzezinski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1992-08

2.  Stress depresses interferon production by leukocytes concomitant with a decrease in natural killer cell activity.

Authors:  R Glaser; J Rice; C E Speicher; J C Stout; J K Kiecolt-Glaser
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Pre-operative emotional states and post-operative recovery.

Authors:  M Johnston
Journal:  Adv Psychosom Med       Date:  1986

4.  Elevation of plasma cytokines in disorders of excessive daytime sleepiness: role of sleep disturbance and obesity.

Authors:  A N Vgontzas; D A Papanicolaou; E O Bixler; A Kales; K Tyson; G P Chrousos
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A 2-year follow-up of 238 patients.

Authors:  K Gill; S L Blumenthal
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1993

6.  Lesion-induced interleukin-6 mRNA expression in rat sciatic nerve.

Authors:  J Zhong; R Heumann
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1995-07-21       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

8.  Use of the McGill pain questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain: replicability and consistency.

Authors:  Charles Graham; Susan S Bond; Mary M Gerkovich; Mary R Cook
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  The effects of psychological stress on humans: increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a Th1-like response in stress-induced anxiety.

Authors:  M Maes; C Song; A Lin; R De Jongh; A Van Gastel; G Kenis; E Bosmans; I De Meester; I Benoy; H Neels; P Demedts; A Janca; S Scharpé; R S Smith
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.861

10.  Growth inhibition of Candida albicans hyphae by CD8+ lymphocytes.

Authors:  D W Beno; A G Stöver; H L Mathews
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  7 in total

1.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Wale A R Sulaiman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Kevin Macwan; Kala Sundararajan; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Myung-Ho Kim; Joong-Bae Seo; Jee-Young Lee; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31

4.  Outcomes of direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) in an Australian cohort.

Authors:  Daniel B Scherman; Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Sean F Mungovan; Kenneth Faulder; Gordon Dandie
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-03

5.  Cost-utility analysis of posterior minimally invasive fusion compared with conventional open fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Y Raja Rampersaud; Randolph Gray; Steven J Lewis; Eric M Massicotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-06-01

6.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, controlled observational study of short-term outcome.

Authors:  Sebastian Hartmann; Anna Lang; Sara Lener; Anto Abramovic; Lukas Grassner; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Postoperative Anemia Predicts Length of Stay for Geriatric Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Ishaan Sachdeva; Jonathan J Carmouche
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2020-03-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.