Literature DB >> 5824068

Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes.

R B Nicklas, C A Koch.   

Abstract

Kinetochore reorientation is the critical process ensuring normal chromosome distribution. Reorientation has been studied in living grasshopper spermatocytes, in which bivalents with both chromosomes oriented to the same pole (unipolar orientation) occur but are unstable: sooner or later one chromosome reorients, the stable, bipolar orientation results, and normal anaphase segregation to opposite poles follows. One possible source of stability in bipolar orientations is the normal spindle forces toward opposite poles, which slightly stretch the bivalent. This tension is lacking in unipolar orientations because all the chromosomal spindle fibers and spindle forces are directed toward one pole. The possible role of tension has been tested directly by micromanipulation of bivalents in unipolar orientation to artificially create the missing tension. Without exception, such bivalents never reorient before the tension is released; a total time "under tension" of over 5 hr has been accumulated in experiments on eight bivalents in eight cells. In control experiments these same bivalents reoriented from a unipolar orientation within 16 min, on the average, in the absence of tension. Controlled reorientation and chromosome segregation can be explained from the results of these and related experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1969        PMID: 5824068      PMCID: PMC2107850          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.43.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  10 in total

1.  [Spermatocyte division of Tipulae. III. Movement behavior of chromosomes in translocation heterozygotes of Tipula oleracea].

Authors:  H BAUER; R DIETZ; C ROEBBELEN
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1961       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Irradiation of parts of individual cells. III. Effects of chromosomal and extrachromosomal irradiation on chromosome movements.

Authors:  W BLOOM; R E ZIRKLE; R B URETZ
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1955-02-03       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Recurrent pole-to-pole movements of the sex chromosome during prometaphase I in Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes.

Authors:  R B NICKLAS
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1961       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  [Multiple sex chromosomes in Ostracoda cypria, their evolution and division characteristics].

Authors:  R DIETZ
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1958       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  [Spermatocyte divisions of Tipulidae. II. Graphical analysis of chromosome movement during prometaphase I in life].

Authors:  R DEITZ
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1956       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  The Orientation of Multiple Associations Resulting from Interchange Heterozygosity.

Authors:  C W Lawrence
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Population cytology of Oedaleonotus. I. The karyotypic facies of Oedaleonotus enigma (Scudder).

Authors:  G Hewitt; G Schroeter
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; C A Staehly
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Kinetochore-to-pole connections during prometaphase of the meiotic divisions in Urechis eggs.

Authors:  P Luykx
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 3.905

  10 in total
  123 in total

1.  The consequences of a non-uniform tension across kinetochores: lessons from segregation of chromosomes in the permanent translocation heterozygote Oenothera.

Authors:  Z Hejnowicz; L J Feldman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Yeast weighs in on the elusive spindle matrix: New filaments in the nucleus.

Authors:  Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A role for centromere pairing in meiotic chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Benedict Kemp; Rebecca Maxfield Boumil; Mara N Stewart; Dean S Dawson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  The spindle checkpoint: a quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Stephen S Taylor; Maria I F Scott; Andrew J Holland
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  A brief history of error.

Authors:  Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Mechanoregulation: Cellular seat belts.

Authors:  Yuta Shimamoto; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Chromosome bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 10.  Force and length in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Sophie Dumont; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.