Literature DB >> 21127954

Can prenatal care impact future well-child visits? The experience of a low income population in New York State Medicaid managed care.

Lindsay W Cogan1, Raina E Josberger, Foster C Gesten, Patrick J Roohan.   

Abstract

To examine the association between maternal characteristics and care patterns and the subsequent utilization of well-child visits in a low income population in New York State (NYS). We analyzed Medicaid managed care birth data from 2004 to 2005 linked to an administrative database to obtain information on preventive well-care visits for the child. The outcome variable was whether the child had five or more well-child visits (WCVs) in their first 15 months of life. Of the 101,461 children in this study 67% had received five or more well-child visits by 15 months of age. This varied by region with a lesser proportion of children receiving well-child visits in New York City (NYC) and a higher proportion in the rest-of-state. Children born to mothers with intensive and adequate prenatal care were significantly more likely to have the necessary well-child visits. Foreign born women were more likely than US born women to bring their children in for well-child visits across all racial and ethnic groups. This study indicated that women who received adequate prenatal care were more likely to bring their children to well-child visits even after adjusting for maternal and infant characteristics. Maternal birthplace modified the association between race and well-child visits. The black-white disparity typically seen in WCVs in the United States was not found in NYC among children of US born women in Medicaid managed care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21127954     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-010-0710-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  23 in total

1.  Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey's HealthStart program.

Authors:  N E Reichman; E M Hade
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates for managed care plans in New York State, 1998.

Authors:  P J Roohan; R E Josberger; F C Gesten
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2001-09

3.  Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Accuracy of birth certificate data regarding the amount, timing, and adequacy of prenatal care using prenatal clinic medical records as referents.

Authors:  K Clark; C M Fu; C Burnett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  G R Alexander; D A Cornely
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Monitoring progress toward achieving Maternal and Infant Healthy People 2010 objectives--19 states, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000-2003.

Authors:  Katherine Suellentrop; Brian Morrow; Letitia Williams; Denise D'Angelo
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2006-10-06

8.  The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.

Authors:  P A Buescher; K P Taylor; M H Davis; J M Bowling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  S A Dobie; L M Baldwin; R A Rosenblatt; M A Fordyce; C H Andrilla; L G Hart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

10.  Risk, antepartum care, and outcome: impact of a maternity and infant care project.

Authors:  R J Sokol; R B Woolf; M G Rosen; K Weingarden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of Statewide Mandatory Medicaid Managed Care (SMMC) Programs on Hospital Obstetric Outcomes.

Authors:  Hasan Symum; José Zayas-Castro
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

3.  Recent health insurance trends for US families: children gain while parents lose.

Authors:  Jennifer E DeVoe; Carrie J Tillotson; Heather Angier; Lorraine S Wallace
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

4.  Predictors of Women's Satisfaction with Prenatal Care in a Canadian Setting.

Authors:  Patricia A Gregory; Maureen I Heaman; Javier Mignone; Michael E Moffatt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-02

5.  Inequities in utilization of prenatal care: a population-based study in the Canadian province of Manitoba.

Authors:  Maureen I Heaman; Patricia J Martens; Marni D Brownell; Mariette J Chartier; Kellie R Thiessen; Shelley A Derksen; Michael E Helewa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.