Literature DB >> 3976948

A controlled evaluation of rural regional perinatal care: impact on mortality and morbidity.

E Siegel, D Gillings, S Campbell, P Guild.   

Abstract

The impact of a rural regional perinatal care (RPC) program was assessed by a quasi-experimental, controlled, population-based design. Outcome measures included changes in five-year average fetal and neonatal mortality rates as well as short-term obstetric and newborn morbidity. Declines in fetal and neonatal as well as birthweight specific mortality rates were observed for both pilot and control regions, for both races, and especially for 1501-2500 g infants. However, comparisons of preprogram (1966-74) and postprogram (1975-80) average yearly changes showed no statistically significant differences between regions. While the incidence of prenatal morbidity was the same for both regions, intrapartum and newborn morbidity significantly favored the pilot region. These results were difficult to interpret. Program relevant implications of the findings in relation to rural RPC in North Carolina are discussed. Specific benefits appeared to be associated with the development of two high-risk maternity clinics and a Level II center capability in the pilot region. The importance of community support and public/private sector cooperation in relation to RPC is noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3976948      PMCID: PMC1646184          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.75.3.246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  15 in total

1.  Prenatal and intrapartum high-risk screening. I. Prediction of the high-rish neonate.

Authors:  C J Hobel; M A Hyvarinen; D M Okada; W Oh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1973-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Evaluation of neonatal-intensive-care program.

Authors:  J C Sinclair; G W Torrance; M H Boyle; S P Horwood; S Saigal; D L Sackett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Decline in neonatal mortality, 1968 to 1977: better babies or better care?

Authors:  R J David; E Siegel
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Neonatal mortality: an analysis of the recent improvement in the United States.

Authors:  K S Lee; N Paneth; L M Gartner; M A Pearlman; L Gruss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Analysis of interrupted time series mortality trends: an example to evaluate regionalized perinatal care.

Authors:  D Gillings; D Makuc; E Siegel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The regional organisation of special care for the neonate.

Authors:  P R Swyer
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 3.278

7.  Regional planning for maternal and perinatal health services.

Authors:  G M Ryan
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Organization of regional perinatal programs.

Authors:  L J Butterfield
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.300

9.  A comparison of 1960 and 1973--1974 early neonatal mortality in selected states.

Authors:  J C Kleinman; M G Kovar; J J Feldman; C A Young
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Risk, antepartum care, and outcome: impact of a maternity and infant care project.

Authors:  R J Sokol; R B Woolf; M G Rosen; K Weingarden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  11 in total

1.  [The transportation problem--transportation in utero compared to transportation of the newborn infant].

Authors:  O Linderkamp; H T Versmold
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Outcomes of regionalized perinatal care in Washington State.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; J A Mayfield; L G Hart; L M Baldwin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-07

3.  A controlled evaluation of a health education programme for pregnant women in rural areas.

Authors:  D Zmirou; M Charrel; C Veyre
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Use of high-technology care among women with high-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  R M Schwartz; J H Muri; M D Overpeck; J C Pezzullo; M D Kogan
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-03

5.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of a community-based enriched model prenatal intervention project in the District of Columbia.

Authors:  A A Herman; H W Berendes; K F Yu; L C Cooper; M D Overpeck; G Rhoads; J P Maxwell; B A Kinney; P A Koslowe; D L Coates
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Facilities and equipment in district general hospitals in the Netherlands: are we prepared for the critically ill paediatric patients?

Authors:  N Van Der Lely; P J C Van Marion; J Otto; J A Hazelzet; H A Büller
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Preventing and postponing death: trends in Tennessee infant mortality.

Authors:  J M Piper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Reducing infant mortality in rural America: evaluation of the Rural Infant Care Program.

Authors:  S L Gortmaker; C J Clark; S N Graven; A M Sobol; A Geronimus
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  A Regionalization Model to Increase Equity of Access to Maternal and Neonatal Care Services in Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Mohammadi Daniali; Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri; Farzad Movahedi Sobhani; Mohammad Heidarzadeh
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2021-12-28

Review 10.  Reducing stillbirths: behavioural and nutritional interventions before and during pregnancy.

Authors:  Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Esme V Menezes; Tanya Soomro; Rachel A Haws; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.