Literature DB >> 8867495

Open common bile duct exploration--end of an epoch?

S T O'Sullivan1, D J Hehir, G C O'Sullivan, W O Kirwan.   

Abstract

With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the impending replacement of open common bile duct exploration, we have reviewed our ten year experience of conventional common bile duct exploration. Open cholecystectomy was performed in 1681 patients and the common bile duct was explored in 325 (19%). Following initial duct exploration, rigid choledo identified residual choledocholithiasis in 58 and periampullary neoplasia in 2 patients. Unexpected retained stones were identified in 3 patients (0.9%). In a further 4 patients, stones which could not be dislodged from the hepatic ducts were confirmed on 10 day T-tube cholangiogram--transduodenal sphincteroplasty had been performed at the time of original surgery in all four. The mortality was 1.9% overall and 1% during the last 5 years. Endoscopic exploration must compare favourably with these data for safe transition to less invasive techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8867495     DOI: 10.1007/bf02942798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  27 in total

1.  Assessing the role of routine choledochoscopy during exploration of the bile duct.

Authors:  K S Scher; S A Gardner; J B Peoples
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-07

2.  A scientific evaluation of operative choledochoscopy in acute cholangitis.

Authors:  W Y Lau; K K Chong; S T Fan; K W Chu; W C Yip; G P Poon; K K Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Cholecystectomy in the elderly: a prospective study.

Authors:  P W Houghton; L R Jenkinson; L A Donaldson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The current status of biliary tract surgery: an international study of 1072 consecutive patients.

Authors:  L DenBesten; G Berci
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges).

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Incidence and associated mortality of retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  A L Rogers; G J Farha; R L Beamer; F C Chang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The value of choledochoscopy in exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; K L Mattox; G L Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Operative choledochoscopy: experience with a rigid choledochoscope.

Authors:  R W Motson; A J Wood; L R De Jode
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Choledochoscopy: are stones missed? A controlled study.

Authors:  P C Gartell; F P McGinn
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledochoscopy for the treatment of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  P C Smith; R V Clayman; N J Soper
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.