Literature DB >> 7354191

Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry.

R D Patterson, I Nimmo-Smith.   

Abstract

The phenomenon of off-frequency listening, and the asymmetry of the auditory filter, were investigated by performing a masking experiment in which a 2.0-kHz tonal signal (0.4 sec in duration) was masked by a pair of noise bands, one below and the other above the tone. The noise bands were 0.8-hKz wide. The edges of the bands were very sharp, the spectrum level in the band was 40 dB SPL, and the masker was on continuously throughout the experiment. Tone threshold was measured as a function of the distances from the tone to the nearer edge of each noise band. It was assumed that conditions in which one noise band was near the tone and the other remote from the tone would encourage the observer to listen off frequency, that is, to center his auditory filter, not at the tone frequency, but at the frequency that optimizes the signal-to-noise ratio at the output of the filter. The threshold data were analysed with a power spectrum model of masking in which it was assumed that the general form of the filter shape was a rounded exponential (a pair of back-to-back, negative exponentials with the peak smoothed and the tails raised). The specific filter shape obtained by applying this model to the threshold data has a broad passband (a 200-Hz, 3-dB bandwidth), steep skirts (slopes of 100 dB/octave) and shallower tails (slopes of 30-50 dB/octave) that take over 30-35 dB down from the peak of sensitivity. The filter is asymmetric, with the lower branch slightly broader than the upper. The filter is shifted off frequency by more than half its bandwidth in some cases, and the shift can improve the signal-to-noise ratio by up to 5.0 dB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7354191     DOI: 10.1121/1.383732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

3.  Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Some problems in the measurement of the frequency-resolving ability of hearing.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

5.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters.

Authors:  Ipek Oruç; Michael S Landy; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall Iii
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.