Literature DB >> 16203023

Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters.

Ipek Oruç1, Michael S Landy, Denis G Pelli.   

Abstract

We investigate the channels underlying identification of second-order letters using a critical-band masking paradigm. We find that observers use a single 1-1.5 octave-wide channel for this task. This channel's best spatial frequency (c/letter) did not change across different noise conditions (indicating the inability of observers to switch channels to improve signal-to-noise ratio) or across different letter sizes (indicating scale invariance), for a fixed carrier frequency (c/letter). However, the channel's best spatial frequency does change with stimulus carrier frequency (both in c/letter); one is proportional to the other. Following Majaj et al. (Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., Kurshan, P., & Palomares, M. (2002). The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification. Vision Research, 42, 1165-1184), we define "stroke frequency" as the line frequency (strokes/deg) in the luminance image. That is, for luminance-defined letters, stroke frequency is the number of lines (strokes) across each letter divided by letter width. For second-order letters, letter texture stroke frequency is the number of carrier cycles (luminance lines) within the letter ink area divided by the letter width. Unlike the nonlinear dependence found for first-order letters (implying scale-dependent processing), for second-order letters the channel frequency is half the letter texture stroke frequency (suggesting scale-invariant processing).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16203023      PMCID: PMC2760253          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  23 in total

1.  Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers.

Authors:  J Gold; P J Bennett; A B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Channel selection with non-white-noise masks.

Authors:  J A Solomon
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Measurement of visual acuity; a critical review.

Authors:  L L SLOAN
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1951-06

5.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection.

Authors:  J Nachmias; R V Sansbury
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking.

Authors:  C F Stromeyer; B Julesz
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1972-10

7.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models.

Authors:  N Graham; J Nachmias
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Additivity of simultaneous masking.

Authors:  R A Lutfi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry.

Authors:  R D Patterson; I Nimmo-Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Learning to identify contrast-defined letters in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Dennis M Levi; Roger W Li
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Identification of contrast-defined letters benefits from perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Crowding between first- and second-order letter stimuli in normal foveal and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Inconsistent channel bandwidth estimates suggest winner-take-all nonlinearity in second-order vision.

Authors:  Zachary M Westrick; Christopher A Henry; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification.

Authors:  Ipek Oruç; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.