Literature DB >> 7331872

Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. III. Inclined objects.

G Tronje, U Welander, W D McDavid, C R Morris.   

Abstract

Mathematical calculations have been performed to analyse how accurately the angle between objects, inclined in space, is reproduced on panoramic films. A marked tolerance against angle distortion was found. Angular measurements may be performed on correctly exposed panoramic films, and the values obtained are satisfactorily accurate for most clinical purposes.

Mesh：

Year:  1981        PMID： 7331872     DOI： 10.1177/028418518102200513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)        ISSN： 0567-8056


  10 in total

1.  An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.

Authors:  P Pittayapat; D Galiti; Y Huang; K Dreesen; M Schreurs; P Couto Souza; I R F Rubira-Bullen; F H Westphalen; R Pauwels; G Kalema; G Willems; R Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Reliability of computational measurement of the condyles on digital panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  A Momjian; D Courvoisier; S Kiliaridis; P Scolozzi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  High-resolution CT of transplanted teeth: imaging technique and measurement accuracy.

Authors:  André Gahleitner; Ulrike Kuchler; Peter Homolka; Janina Heschl; Georg Watzek; Herwig Imhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.

Authors:  A G Farman; T T Farman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Dental compensation for moderate Class III with vertical growth pattern by extraction of the lower second molars.

Authors:  Collin Jacobs; Claudia Jacobs-Müller; Viviana Hoffmann; Dan Meila; Christina Erbe; Elena Krieger; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Factors associated with spontaneous mesialization of impacted mandibular third molars after second molar protraction.

Authors:  Un-Bong Baik; Jin Hye Kang; Ui-Lyong Lee; Nikhilesh R Vaid; Yoon-Ji Kim; Dong-Yul Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel G Bouwens; Lucia Cevidanes; John B Ludlow; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  KPG index versus OPG measurements: a comparison between 3D and 2D methods in predicting treatment duration and difficulty level for patients with impacted maxillary canines.

Authors:  Domenico Dalessandri; Marco Migliorati; Luca Visconti; Luca Contardo; Chung How Kau; Conchita Martin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Comparison of the reproducibility of panoramic radiographs between dentulous and edentulous patients.

Authors:  Jong-Woong Park; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Study of the influence of crossbite on the size of the apical area in a child population by analyzing panoramic X-ray.

Authors:  Nazareth Rodríguez-Peinado; Montserrat Diéguez-Pérez; Gloria Saavedra-Marbán; María-Rosa Mourelle-Martínez
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-08-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.