OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a computational method for assessing three condylar measurements on digital panoramic radiographs: condylar height, area and perimeter. METHODS: A computer calculation of the area, the perimeter and the height of 34 condyles was determined on digital panoramic radiographs taken from 17 patients. The test-retest precision of measurements calculation was estimated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dahlberg's formula at 2 week intervals on the same radiograph to assess intraobserver precision and on two radiographs (RX1 and RX2) to assess the radiographic procedure precision. Changes between measurements on RX1 and RX2 were estimated using paired t-tests to detect systematic errors. RESULTS: Precision of all indices was very high when measurements were made on the same radiograph, thus confirming good reliability for the present computational measuring method. The precision was lower when two different radiographs were compared but was still within an acceptable range of tolerance. There were no statistically significant changes in condylar area, perimeter or height values between RX1 and RX2. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that (1) the height of the condyle can be rapidly and reliably assessed using a specific computer system directly on digital panoramic radiographs; (2) although less reliable, area and perimeter can also be acceptably evaluated; and (3) this method has the potential for being routinely used to monitor changes in clinical follow-up as well as for research purposes.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a computational method for assessing three condylar measurements on digital panoramic radiographs: condylar height, area and perimeter. METHODS: A computer calculation of the area, the perimeter and the height of 34 condyles was determined on digital panoramic radiographs taken from 17 patients. The test-retest precision of measurements calculation was estimated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Dahlberg's formula at 2 week intervals on the same radiograph to assess intraobserver precision and on two radiographs (RX1 and RX2) to assess the radiographic procedure precision. Changes between measurements on RX1 and RX2 were estimated using paired t-tests to detect systematic errors. RESULTS: Precision of all indices was very high when measurements were made on the same radiograph, thus confirming good reliability for the present computational measuring method. The precision was lower when two different radiographs were compared but was still within an acceptable range of tolerance. There were no statistically significant changes in condylar area, perimeter or height values between RX1 and RX2. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that (1) the height of the condyle can be rapidly and reliably assessed using a specific computer system directly on digital panoramic radiographs; (2) although less reliable, area and perimeter can also be acceptably evaluated; and (3) this method has the potential for being routinely used to monitor changes in clinical follow-up as well as for research purposes.
Authors: S L Brooks; J W Brand; S J Gibbs; L Hollender; A G Lurie; K A Omnell; P L Westesson; S C White Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 1997-05