Literature DB >> 7320229

Changing rates and indications for cesarean sections at a community hospital from 1972 to 1979.

N N Sehgal.   

Abstract

The indications for all cesarean sections done at Charleston Area Medical Center from 1972 to 1979 were reviewed. The cesarean section rate rose from 4.4% in 1972 to 8.8% in 1975, to 17.2% in 1979. Repeat cesarean sections accounted for 30.3% of all cesarean sections. The increase in the rate of primary cesarean sections was due to more cesarean sections being done for old indications as well as for the additional indications. From 1972 to 1979, cesarean sections performed for indication of dystocia increased threefold, for fetal distress ninefold, and for breech presentation elevenfold. Dystocia, however, remained the leading indication for primary cesarean section. Even though more cesarean sections and fetal surveillance tests were done from 1976 to 1979 than from 1972 to 1975, the perinatal mortality rate during the two four-year periods was not significantly different. Recommendations are made to a more objective and rational evaluation of the need to perform cesarean sections and for a periodic audit of both the operation and cost-effectiveness of the newer technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7320229     DOI: 10.1007/bf01323079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  30 in total

1.  Fetal monitoring: its effect on the perinatal mortality and cesarean section rates and its complications.

Authors:  G Tutera; R L Newman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Changing trends in cesarean section.

Authors:  L T Hibbard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The fetal monitoring debate.

Authors:  J C Hobbins; R Freeman; J T Queenan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; H E Thompson; J G McFee; C Cetrulo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Are current rates of Cesarean justified?

Authors:  J B Caire
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Effect of fetal monitoring on cesarean section rates.

Authors:  R R Neutra; S Greenland; E A Friedman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring.

Authors:  A D Haverkamp; M Orleans; S Langendoerfer; J McFee; J Murphy; H E Thompson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Cesarean section: a contemporary assessment.

Authors:  J R Evrard; E M Gold; T F Cahill
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial.

Authors:  I M Kelso; R J Parsons; G F Lawrence; S S Arora; D K Edmonds; I D Cooke
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section.

Authors:  B S Merrill; C E Gibbs
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.