Literature DB >> 7308361

Neuronal mechanisms for pitch analysis in the time domain.

G Langner.   

Abstract

Many units in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea fowl are found to be tuned to amplitude modulated tones (AM). For a given response maximum the relationship of the period tau m of the modulation frequency fm and the period tau c of the carrier frequency fc may be given by an empirical equation: m . tau m + n . tau c = 1 . tau l, where m, n and l are small integers typical for a unit. tau l is a time constant of 0.4 ms. The temporal pattern of the neuronal response support these findings. The averages of spike trains oscillate with periods multiple to tau l. These oscillations are elicited by stimulus onsets and zero crossings of fm and may by coupled strongly to fm depending on fc. Variation of fm or fc shifts the mean delay of the phase coupled activity proportional to m . tau m and n . tau c, respectively. These effects may be explained with activity phase coupled to fc which coincides at the level of the recorded units with oscillations coupled to fm. This is expressed by the above given periodicity equation. Psychophysical results with AM-stimuli indicate that the mechanisms described and the periodicity equation are adequate for the explanation of the analysis of periodicity pitch in humans. Hence the period corresponding to pitch is defined by tau p = n . tau c-1 . tau l, where n and 1 are integers and tau l = 0.4 ms. Plots of tau p as a function of tau c reveal steps at 0.4 ms intervals indicating that the neuronal time constant is the same in both species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7308361     DOI: 10.1007/bf00238840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  STIMULUS CODING IN THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS.

Authors:  N Y KIANG; R R PFEIFFER; W B WARR; A S BACKUS
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Microelectrode study of superior olivary nuclei.

Authors:  R GALAMBOS; J SCHWARTZKOPFF; A RUPERT
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1959-09

3.  A duplex theory of pitch perception.

Authors:  J C R LICKLIDER
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1951-04-15

4.  Dichotic pitch fusion.

Authors:  G van den Brink; K Sintnicolaas; W S van Stam
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The pattern-transformation model of pitch.

Authors:  F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Mechanisms of signal analysis and pattern perception in periodicity pitch.

Authors:  J L Goldstein
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct

7.  Classification of response patterns of spike discharges for units in the cochlear nucleus: tone-burst stimulation.

Authors:  R R Pfeiffer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of sound direction on the processing of amplitude-modulated signals in the frog inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J Xu; D M Gooler; A S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  ZEBrA: Zebra finch Expression Brain Atlas-A resource for comparative molecular neuroanatomy and brain evolution studies.

Authors:  Peter V Lovell; Morgan Wirthlin; Taylor Kaser; Alexa A Buckner; Julia B Carleton; Brian R Snider; Anne K McHugh; Alexander Tolpygo; Partha P Mitra; Claudio V Mello
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus single neurons can enhance temporal processing capabilities in background noise.

Authors:  R D Frisina; J P Walton; K J Karcich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial cross-correlation. A proposed mechanism for acoustic pitch perception.

Authors:  G E Loeb; M W White; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Evidence for neuronal periodicity detection in the auditory system of the Guinea fowl: implications for pitch analysis in the time domain.

Authors:  G Langner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Periodicity extraction in the anuran auditory nerve. I. "Pitch-shift" effects.

Authors:  A M Simmons; M Ferragamo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 10.  Role of Oscillations in Auditory Temporal Processing: A General Model for Temporal Processing of Sensory Information in the Brain?

Authors:  Andreas Bahmer; Daya Shankar Gupta
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.