Literature DB >> 7250263

Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons.

B J Frost, P L Scilley, S C Wong.   

Abstract

The experiments reported in this paper were carried out to determine the effect moving background patterns have on the response characteristics of directionally specific neurons in the pigeon optic tectum. First, care was taken to select the optimal single stimulus for each cell, then large textured patterns were added to the test stimulus and moved either "in-phase" or "anti-phase". Altogether 214 cells were studied in 77 white Carneaux pigeons and it was found that all cells below a depth of 400 microns were inhibited by backgrounds moved "in-phase" with the optimal test stimulus, while few cells above this level were affected in any way by backgrounds. All directions of background motion containing an "in-phase" vector resulted in rather profound inhibition of the directional response while directions with an "anti-phase" vector produced less inhibition and sometimes were even facilitated by direct "anti-phase". The velocity tuning curves obtained with an optimal single test stimulus and by "anti-phase" movement of backgrounds were essentially similar. "In-phase" inhibition can also be produced by a second spot stimulus located some distance from the test stimulus. This latter effect was used to map the outer margins of the inhibitory receptive fields of deep tectal neurons displaying these effects and it was found they were extremely large, often in excess of 100 degrees in diameter. When masks were used to prevent the moving background from stimulating the excitatory receptive field "anti-phase" movement always produced facilitation. This suggests a double opponent-process directionally specific receptive field organization. These neurons seem well suited to respond to local (object) motion and to ignore translation of the visual image arising from body, head and eye movements.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7250263     DOI: 10.1007/bf00237761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Motor function of the tectal and tegmental area.

Authors:  W R HESS; S BUERGI; V BUCHER
Journal:  Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol       Date:  1946

2.  Influence of the presentation of remote visual stimuli on visual responses of cat area 17 and lateral suprasylvian area.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effects of remote retinal stimulation on the responses of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  H B Barlow; A M Derrington; L R Harris; P Lennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  C Blakemore; E A Tobin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sustained and transient neurones in the cat's retina and lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  B G Cleland; M W Dubin; W R Levick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The superior colliculus and movements of the head and eyes in cats.

Authors:  L R Harris
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Visual receptive fields sensitive to absolute and relative motion during tracking.

Authors:  B Bridgeman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Discharge characteristics of single units in superior colliculus of the alert rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; F Koerner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Moving background patterns alter directionally specific responses of pigeon tectal neurons.

Authors:  B J Frost
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-08-11       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  [Pattern of neuronal discharge in the optic tectum of the rabbit in passive and active spontaneous movements].

Authors:  K P Schaefer
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1967
View more
  24 in total

1.  Specificity of projections from wide-field and local motion-processing regions within the middle temporal visual area of the owl monkey.

Authors:  V K Berezovskii; R T Born
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Responses from outside classical receptive fields of dorsal lateral geniculate cells in rabbits.

Authors:  S Molotchnikoff; A Cérat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual object categorization in birds and primates: integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a "general process" framework.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Stimulus-specific adaptation: can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation?

Authors:  Shai Netser; Yael Zahar; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual response characteristics of neurons in the nucleus isthmi magnocellularis and nucleus isthmi parvocellularis of pigeons.

Authors:  Y C Wang; B J Frost
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  'Real-motion' cells in visual area V2 of behaving macaque monkeys.

Authors:  C Galletti; P P Battaglini; G Aicardi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Avian ultraviolet/violet cones as magnetoreceptors: The problem of separating visual and magnetic information.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Bischof; Christine Nießner; Leo Peichl; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

8.  Space-Specific Deficits in Visual Orientation Discrimination Caused by Lesions in the Midbrain Stimulus Selection Network.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen; Jason S Schwarz; Phyllis F Knudsen; Devarajan Sridharan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Deep tectal cells in pigeons respond to kinematograms.

Authors:  B J Frost; P Cavanagh; B Morgan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Local motion processing in the optic tectum of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus.

Authors:  M Satou; A Shiraishi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.