Literature DB >> 28669762

Space-Specific Deficits in Visual Orientation Discrimination Caused by Lesions in the Midbrain Stimulus Selection Network.

Eric I Knudsen1, Jason S Schwarz2, Phyllis F Knudsen2, Devarajan Sridharan3.   

Abstract

Perceptual decisions require both analysis of sensory information and selective routing of relevant information to decision networks. This study explores the contribution of a midbrain network to visual perception in chickens. Analysis of visual orientation information in birds takes place in the forebrain sensory area called the Wulst, as it does in the primary visual cortex (V1) of mammals. In contrast, the midbrain, which receives parallel retinal input, encodes orientation poorly, if at all. We discovered, however, that small electrolytic lesions in the midbrain severely impair a chicken's ability to discriminate orientations. Focal lesions were placed in the optic tectum (OT) and in the nucleus isthmi pars parvocellularis (Ipc)-key nodes in the midbrain stimulus selection network-in chickens trained to perform an orientation discrimination task. A lesion in the OT caused a severe impairment in orientation discrimination specifically for targets at the location in space represented by the lesioned location. Distracting stimuli increased the deficit. A lesion in the Ipc produced similar but more transient effects. We discuss the possibilities that performance deficits were caused by interference with orientation information processing (sensory deficit) versus with the routing of information in the forebrain (agnosia). The data support the proposal that the OT transmits a space-specific signal that is required to gate orientation information from the Wulst into networks that mediate behavioral decisions, analogous to the role of ascending signals from the superior colliculus (SC) in monkeys. Furthermore, our results indicate a critical role for the cholinergic Ipc in this gating process.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; behavior; bird; chicken; cognition; optic tectum; perceptual decision; superior colliculus; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28669762      PMCID: PMC6101031          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  50 in total

1.  Loss of attentional stimulus selection after extrastriate cortical lesions in macaques.

Authors:  P De Weerd; M R Peralta; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Nucleus isthmi, pars semilunaris as a key component of the tectofugal visual system in pigeons.

Authors:  B Hellmann; M Manns; O Güntürkün
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-07-23       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Visual response pattern of thalamic neurons in the pigeon.

Authors:  L R De Britto; M Brunelli; W Francesconi; F Magni
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-10-31       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Multiple sites of adaptive plasticity in the owl's auditory localization pathway.

Authors:  William M DeBello; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Dominant vertical orientation processing without clustered maps: early visual brain dynamics imaged with voltage-sensitive dye in the pigeon visual Wulst.

Authors:  Benedict Shien Wei Ng; Agnieszka Grabska-Barwińska; Onur Güntürkün; Dirk Jancke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Auditory and multisensory responses in the tectofugal pathway of the barn owl.

Authors:  Amit Reches; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Parallel midbrain microcircuits perform independent temporal transformations.

Authors:  C Alex Goddard; John Huguenard; Eric Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Visual intensity and pattern discrimination deficits after lesions of the optic lobe in pigeons.

Authors:  W Hodos; H J Karten
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 9.  Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Michael E Hasselmo; John P Bruno; Ben Givens
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2005-02

10.  The organization of the visual hyperstriatum in the domestic chick. II. Receptive field properties of single units.

Authors:  P Wilson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-04-28       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reply to Friedrich et al.: Both genetic and environmental factors may contribute to laterality in mesencephalic connectivity and bias.

Authors:  Varsha Sreenivasan; Devarajan Sridharan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Directional Preference in Avian Midbrain Saliency Computing Nucleus Reflects a Well-Designed Receptive Field Structure.

Authors:  Jiangtao Wang; Longlong Qian; Songwei Wang; Li Shi; Zhizhong Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 3.  Neural Circuits That Mediate Selective Attention: A Comparative Perspective.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  Evolution of neural processing for visual perception in vertebrates.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.215

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.