Literature DB >> 3373454

Deep tectal cells in pigeons respond to kinematograms.

B J Frost1, P Cavanagh, B Morgan.   

Abstract

Deep tectal neurons in pigeons respond selectively to moving visual stimuli, and are inhibited by large background patterns moved in-phase with these stimuli. In this investigation we demonstrate that these same deep tectal neurons respond equally well to kinematograms as they do to traditional luminance contrast stimuli typically employed in visual experiments. Computer generated kinematograms, the motion domain equivalents of random dot stereograms, were used as stimuli in these experiments. These kinematograms, where a small centrally located set of random dots is moved coherently in one direction while the remaining dots are moved in a different direction, thus constitute a pure motion stimulus where the stimulus form is only visible in the dynamic pattern, but does not exist on any single frame. Both 'object' configured and 'hole' configured kinematograms were employed; the former appearing as regions of texture moving over, or in front of, the background texture, while the latter appear as windows through which a more distant textured surface is revealed. Extracellular recordings from isolated deep tectal cells showed that all units responded in a very similar manner whether the stimulus was an 'object' configured kinematogram or the more traditional luminance contrast variety. This similarity included directional selectivity, the in-phase inhibition anti-phase facilitation effect, and sensitivity to opposed motion independent of direction. However, when the kinematograms were configured as 'holes' none of the units tested responded to these stimuli. The significance of these observations for tectal functioning, image segmentation through motion and animal camouflage is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3373454     DOI: 10.1007/bf01342639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  19 in total

1.  Global visual processing in the monkey superior colliculus.

Authors:  D B Bender; R M Davidson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-09-03       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Motion detection in the presence and absence of background motion in an Anolis lizard.

Authors:  L J Fleishman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Biological image motion processing: a review.

Authors:  K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Deficits in visual motion processing following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  W T Newsome; R H Wurtz; M R Dürsteler; A Mikami
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image.

Authors:  H C Longuet-Higgins; K Prazdny
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-17

Review 6.  Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons.

Authors:  J Allman; F Miezin; E McGuinness
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction.

Authors:  B J Frost; K Nakayama
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation.

Authors:  J H Maunsell; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons.

Authors:  B J Frost; P L Scilley; S C Wong
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  15 in total

1.  Purkinje cells in the vestibulocerebellum of the pigeon respond best to either translational or rotational wholefield visual motion.

Authors:  D R Wylie; B J Frost
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual response characteristics of neurons in the nucleus isthmi magnocellularis and nucleus isthmi parvocellularis of pigeons.

Authors:  Y C Wang; B J Frost
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The visual response properties of neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root of the pigeon: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  D R Wylie; B J Frost
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Active Dendritic Properties and Local Inhibitory Input Enable Selectivity for Object Motion in Mouse Superior Colliculus Neurons.

Authors:  Samuel D Gale; Gabe J Murphy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Bilateral and ipsilateral ascending tectopulvinar pathways in mammals: a study in the squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi).

Authors:  Felipe Fredes; Tomas Vega-Zuniga; Harvey Karten; Jorge Mpodozis
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Local motion processing in the optic tectum of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus.

Authors:  M Satou; A Shiraishi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Figure-ground discrimination in the avian brain: the nucleus rotundus and its inhibitory complex.

Authors:  Martin J Acerbo; Olga F Lazareva; John McInnerney; Emily Leiker; Edward A Wasserman; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual perception of texture in aggressive behavior of Betta splendens.

Authors:  T Bando
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates of Perceptual Grouping by Motion in the Barn Owl.

Authors:  Yael Zahar; Tidhar Lev-Ari; Hermann Wagner; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Responses of tectal neurons to contrasting stimuli: an electrophysiological study in the barn owl.

Authors:  Yael Zahar; Hermann Wagner; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.