Literature DB >> 7174699

Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists.

A B Schultz, G B Andersson, K Haderspeck, R Ortengren, M Nordin, R Björk.   

Abstract

Ten subjects performed isometric weight-holding and force-resisting work tasks while standing upright, both with and without a twist of the trunk; with the trunk bent laterally; and in postures involving combinations of bending and twisting. The lumbar trunk muscle contraction forces and the lumbar spine compression and shear forces imposed by these tasks were predicted using a biomechanical model. Myoelectric activity was recorded quantitatively at eight locations over the back muscles and at four locations over the abdominal wall muscles. Correlation coefficients from 0.67 to 0.88 were found between the predicted muscle contraction forces and the measured myoelectric activities when the predictions were made so as to minimize muscle contraction force per unit area. Trunk twisting and lateral bending were found to load the spine and trunk muscles less than trunk flexion or holding of weights in front of the body.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7174699     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(82)90021-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

Review 1.  Exercise for people with osteoporosis: translating the science into clinical practice.

Authors:  Kathy M Shipp
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Trunk biomechanical models based on equilibrium at a single-level violate equilibrium at other levels.

Authors:  N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The Safe Functional Motion test is reliable for assessment of functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  Norma J MacIntyre; Carrie L Stavness; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Biomechanics of intervertebral disk degeneration.

Authors:  Nozomu Inoue; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Analysis of human torso motion with muscle actuators.

Authors:  A Katbab
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  A comparison of a maximum exertion method and a model-based, sub-maximum exertion method for normalizing trunk EMG.

Authors:  Jacek Cholewicki; Jaap van Dieën; Angela S Lee; N Peter Reeves
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Loads in the spinal structures during lifting: development of a three-dimensional comprehensive biomechanical model.

Authors:  J S Han; V K Goel; J Y Ahn; J Winterbottom; D McGowan; J Weinstein; T Cook
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Ex vivo loading of trussed implants for spine fusion induces heterogeneous strains consistent with homeostatic bone mechanobiology.

Authors:  Jason P Caffrey; Esther Cory; Van W Wong; Koichi Masuda; Albert C Chen; Jessee P Hunt; Timothy M Ganey; Robert L Sah
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  In vivo measurement of implant loads in a patient with a fractured vertebral body.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; G Bergmann; F Graichen; U Weber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Effect of screw position on load transfer in lumbar pedicle screws: a non-idealized finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anna G U S Newcomb; Seungwon Baek; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 1.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.