Literature DB >> 19876685

The Safe Functional Motion test is reliable for assessment of functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture.

Norma J MacIntyre1, Carrie L Stavness, Jonathan D Adachi.   

Abstract

The Safe Functional Motion (SFM) test is a performance-based tool developed to assess functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture. The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the scores on the short form of the SFM test (SFM-SF). A secondary objective was to evaluate the construct convergent validity of the balance domain. Community-dwelling adults with low bone mass (n = 36) completed the SFM-SF on two occasions. During one visit, SFM-SF performance was scored by two testers and additional tests of balance (Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BERG), and Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS)) were completed. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the SFM-SF score is excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient >or= 0.90), and the balance domain score demonstrates acceptable associations with established clinical measures of balance (Spearman's rho = -0.69, 0.76, and 0.83 for TUG, BERG, and CBMS, respectively). SFM-SF provides reliable measures of functional movements in community-dwelling individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19876685     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-009-1297-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  22 in total

1.  Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of a functional training intervention.

Authors:  M B King; J O Judge; R Whipple; L Wolfson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-01

2.  Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test.

Authors:  A Shumway-Cook; S Brauer; M Woollacott
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-09

3.  An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. The Physical Performance Test.

Authors:  D B Reuben; A L Siu
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  The Physical Performance Test as a predictor of frequent fallers: a prospective community-based cohort study.

Authors:  Kim Delbaere; Nele Van den Noortgate; Jan Bourgois; Guy Vanderstraeten; Willems Tine; Dirk Cambier
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Falls-related self-efficacy is independently associated with balance and mobility in older women with low bone mass.

Authors:  Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Karim M Khan; Meghan G Donaldson; Janice J Eng; Stephen R Lord; Heather A McKay
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists.

Authors:  A B Schultz; G B Andersson; K Haderspeck; R Ortengren; M Nordin; R Björk
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The Community Balance and Mobility Scale--a balance measure for individuals with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  J A Howe; E L Inness; A Venturini; J I Williams; M C Verrier
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.477

9.  Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Jaap H van Dieën; Tim V Wrigley; Alison M Greig; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-05

10.  Maximal voluntary and functional performance levels needed for independence in adults aged 65 to 97 years.

Authors:  M Elaine Cress; Mary Meyer
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2003-01
View more
  7 in total

1.  Hospitalization in High Fracture Risk Older Adults with Osteoporosis Using the Safe Functional Motion Test: A Longitudinal Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel J Van Dussen; Chris P Recknor; Julie C Recknor
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2021-02-26

2.  Scores on the safe functional motion test are associated with prevalent fractures and fall history.

Authors:  Chris P Recknor; Stephanie L Grant; Julie C Recknor; Norma J Macintyre
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Too Fit To Fracture: outcomes of a Delphi consensus process on physical activity and exercise recommendations for adults with osteoporosis with or without vertebral fractures.

Authors:  L M Giangregorio; S McGill; J D Wark; J Laprade; A Heinonen; M C Ashe; N J MacIntyre; A M Cheung; K Shipp; H Keller; R Jain; A Papaioannou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Correlation of postural balance and knee muscle strength in the sit-to-stand test among women with and without postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  G C Brech; A C Alonso; N M S Luna; J M Greve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Scores on the Safe Functional Motion test predict incident vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  N J MacIntyre; C P Recknor; S L Grant; J C Recknor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Inclinometer-based measures of standing posture in older adults with low bone mass are reliable and associated with self-reported, but not performance-based, physical function.

Authors:  N J MacIntyre; A L Lorbergs; J D Adachi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  The importance of physical function to people with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C Kerr; C Bottomley; S Shingler; L Giangregorio; H M de Freitas; C Patel; S Randall; D T Gold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.507

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.