Literature DB >> 7552650

Loads in the spinal structures during lifting: development of a three-dimensional comprehensive biomechanical model.

J S Han1, V K Goel, J Y Ahn, J Winterbottom, D McGowan, J Weinstein, T Cook.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have shown that loads imposed on the human spine during daily living play a significant role in the onset of low back pain. The loads applied to the lumbar spine are shared by a number of structures: muscles; posterior elements, including facets and ligaments; and the disc of a ligamentous motion segment. In vivo, it is not practical to determine forces in these structures using experimental techniques. Biomechanical models, based on an optimization technique of electromyographic activities of the trunk muscles, have been proposed to predict forces in the load transmitting structures. The mathematical models reported in the literature are based on information collected from a wide variety of sources, of which the subject that takes part in the experiment is only one. The present study describes techniques developed in our laboratory to collect from the subjects themselves all the data needed for the formulation of a biomechanical model. The results demonstrated that back lifting with 0 N (no load), 90 N, and 180 N in the hands created maximum external flexion moments respectively of 109.6 Nm, 137.9 Nm, and 161.7 Nm, at the L3-4 disc level. The corresponding external axial compression forces on the disc were 469.5 N, 511.8 N, and 601.5 N. The predicted disc compression varied from 3.4 to 5.0 times the body weight. In comparison to the static lifting mode, the dynamic lifting task caused an increase in the disc compression force ranging from 15.8% to 39.4% depending on the load being lifted (e.g., 3256 N for the dynamic mode vs. 2516 N for the static mode when the subject lifted 90 N). The salient features of the entire protocol developed by the authors and the need for further improvements are also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7552650     DOI: 10.1007/bf00298240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double linear programming method.

Authors:  J C Bean; D B Chaffin; A B Schultz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Quantitative electromyographic studies of back muscle activity relatated to posture and loading.

Authors:  G B Andersson; R Ortengren; P Herberts
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  A comparison of intraabdominal pressure increases, hip torque, and lumbar vertebral compression in different lifting techniques.

Authors:  J D Troup; T P Leskinen; H R Stalhammar; I A Kuorinka
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  The load on the lumbo-sacral joint and trunk muscle activity during lifting.

Authors:  J Ekholm; U P Arborelius; G Németh
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  The effect of inertial factors on spinal stress when lifting.

Authors:  T P Leskinen; H R Stålhammar; I A Kuorinka; J D Troup
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1983-04

6.  A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads.

Authors:  A Freivalds; D B Chaffin; A Garg; K S Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Comparison of static and dynamic biomechanical models.

Authors:  T P Leskinen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals.

Authors:  A Schultz; G Andersson; R Ortengren; K Haderspeck; A Nachemson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Lumbar spine loading during half-squat exercises.

Authors:  A Cappozzo; F Felici; F Figura; F Gazzani
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  CT-based geometric data of human spine musculature. Part I. Japanese patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J S Han; J Y Ahn; V K Goel; R Takeuchi; D McGowan
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Dynamic stiffness and damping of human intervertebral disc using axial oscillatory displacement under a free mass system.

Authors:  O Izambert; D Mitton; M Thourot; F Lavaste
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cell-Seeded Adhesive Biomaterial for Repair of Annulus Fibrosus Defects in Intervertebral Discs.

Authors:  Michelle A Cruz; Warren W Hom; Tyler J DiStefano; Robert Merrill; Olivia M Torre; Huizi A Lin; Andrew C Hecht; Svenja Illien-Junger; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  In vivo loads in the lumbar L3-4 disc during a weight lifting extension.

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Won Man Park; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Thomas Cha; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  The activL(®) Artificial Disc: a next-generation motion-preserving implant for chronic lumbar discogenic pain.

Authors:  James J Yue; Rolando Garcia; Larry E Miller
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-05-10

5.  The Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation on Musculoskeletal Loadings in the Spinal Region During Level Walking and Stair Climbing.

Authors:  Shengzheng Kuai; Zhenhua Liao; Wenyu Zhou; Xinyu Guan; Run Ji; Rui Zhang; Daiqi Guo; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-08-10

6.  People With Low Back Pain Display a Different Distribution of Erector Spinae Activity During a Singular Mono-Planar Lifting Task.

Authors:  Andy Sanderson; Corrado Cescon; Nicola R Heneghan; Pauline Kuithan; Eduardo Martinez-Valdes; Alison Rushton; Marco Barbero; Deborah Falla
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-12-20

7.  High-resolution, three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging axial load dynamic study improves diagnostics of the lumbar spine in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tomasz Lorenc; Marek Gołębiowski; Wojciech Michalski; Wojciech Glinkowski
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-01-18

8.  Multi-Rod Constructs Can Prevent Rod Breakage and Pseudarthrosis at the Lumbosacral Junction in Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Robert K Merrill; Jun S Kim; Dante M Leven; Joung Heon Kim; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-11

9.  The Effect of Lumbar Disc Herniation on Spine Loading Characteristics during Trunk Flexion and Two Types of Picking Up Activities.

Authors:  Shengzheng Kuai; Weiqiang Liu; Run Ji; Wenyu Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-06-11       Impact factor: 2.682

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.