Literature DB >> 27836500

Ex vivo loading of trussed implants for spine fusion induces heterogeneous strains consistent with homeostatic bone mechanobiology.

Jason P Caffrey1, Esther Cory1, Van W Wong1, Koichi Masuda2, Albert C Chen1, Jessee P Hunt3, Timothy M Ganey4, Robert L Sah5.   

Abstract

A truss structure was recently introduced as an interbody fusion cage. As a truss system, some of the connected elements may be in a state of compression and others in tension. This study aimed to quantify both the mean and variance of strut strains in such an implant when loaded in a simulated fusion condition with vertebral body or contoured plastic loading platens ex vivo. Cages were each instrumented with 78 fiducial spheres, loaded between platens (vertebral body or contoured plastic), imaged using high resolution micro-CT, and analyzed for deformation and strain of each of the 221 struts. With repeated loading of a cage by vertebral platens, the distribution (variance, indicated by SD) of strut strains widened from 50N control (4±114με, mean±SD) to 1000N (-23±273με) and 2000N (-48±414με), and between 1000N and 2000N. With similar loading of multiple cages, the strain distribution at 2000N (23±389με) increased from 50N control. With repeated loading by contoured plastic platens, induced strains at 2000N had a distribution similar to that induced by vertebral platens (84±426με). In all studies, cages exhibited increases in strut strain amplitude when loaded from 50N to 1000N or 2000N. Correspondingly, at 2000N, 59-64% of struts exhibited strain amplitudes consistent with mechanobiologically-regulated bone homeostasis. At 2000N, vertically-oriented struts exhibited deformation of -2.87±2.04μm and strain of -199±133με, indicating overall cage compression. Thus, using an ex vivo 3-D experimental biomechanical analysis method, a truss implant can have strains induced by physiological loading that are heterogeneous and of amplitudes consistent with mechanobiological bone homeostasis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental mechanics; Interbody fusion; Lumbar spine; Micro-computed tomography; Strain

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27836500      PMCID: PMC5164966          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  42 in total

1.  A new technique to measure micromotion distribution around a cementless femoral stem.

Authors:  Michael Gortchacow; Michael Wettstein; Dominique P Pioletti; Alexandre Terrier
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: a prospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  R C Bishop; K A Moore; M N Hadley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; T P Pinilla; R P Crawford; D L Kopperdahl; A Lou
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.

Authors:  Aniruddh N Nayak; Sergio Gutierrez; James B Billys; Brandon G Santoni; Antonio E Castellvi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Biomechanics of lateral lumbar interbody fusion constructs with lateral and posterior plate fixation: laboratory investigation.

Authors:  Guy R Fogel; Rachit D Parikh; Stephen I Ryu; Alexander W L Turner
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-01-03

Review 7.  Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain.

Authors:  R L Duncan; C H Turner
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices.

Authors:  M Kanayama; B W Cunningham; C J Haggerty; K Abumi; K Kaneda; P C McAfee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Interbody cage devices.

Authors:  Thomas A Zdeblick; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Novel speckle-tracking radial strain from routine black-and-white echocardiographic images to quantify dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Matthew S Suffoletto; Kaoru Dohi; Maxime Cannesson; Samir Saba; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Prospective, Randomized Study Evaluating Clinical and Radiographic Efficacy of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed Using a Truss Technology-Based Interbody Fusion Device With Homologous Bone or Bone Marrow Aspirate.

Authors:  Benjamin Chatterjee; Michael Rauschmann; Christoph Fleege; Mohammad Arabmotlagh; Sven Schmidt; Kimberly Martin; Marcus Rickert
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

2.  Outcomes of Surgical Reconstruction Using Custom 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Implants for Critical-Sized Bone Defects of the Foot and Ankle.

Authors:  Bijan Abar; Nicholas Kwon; Nicholas B Allen; Trent Lau; Lindsey G Johnson; Ken Gall; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  Patient-Specific Variations in Local Strain Patterns on the Surface of a Trussed Titanium Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Arjan C Y Loenen; Jérôme Noailly; Keita Ito; Paul C Willems; Jacobus J Arts; Bert van Rietbergen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-11

4.  Bone Mineralization and Spinal Fusion Evaluation of a Truss-based Interbody Fusion Device: Ovine Finite Element Analysis with Confirmatory In Vivo Outcomes.

Authors:  Ali Kiapour; Howard B Seim; Brent L Atkinson; Peggy A Lalor; Jon E Block
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.