Literature DB >> 7152861

Requirements for accurate manometric recording of pharyngeal and esophageal peristaltic pressure waves.

J Orlowski, W J Dodds, J H Linehan, J Dent, W J Hogan, R C Arndorfer.   

Abstract

The frequency characteristics and wave form of peristaltic pressure complexes occurring in the pharynx and esophagus of normal subjects were studied. For each of five subjects, five peristaltic waves were selected for analysis from the proximal and distal pharynx as well as the proximal, middle, and distal esophagus. Thus, 25 peristaltic waves were analyzed from each of the five regions studied, giving a total of 125 in all. After digitization of the peristaltic waves, pressure values were entered into a computer algorithm that performed a Fourier transformation to determine frequency content and wave slope. The computer analysis revealed that a frequency response flat to 5 Hz was adequate to record 98% of esophageal peristaltic waves with 98% accuracy. In contrast, recording accuracy up to 48 Hz was needed for high-fidelity recording in the pharynx. Rates of pressure change were substantially greater for pharyngeal peristaltic pressure complexes compared with esophageal peristaltic complexes. The results suggest that appropriately designed infused-catheter systems can readily meet the requirements for accurate recording of peristaltic pressure waves in the esophagus but not in the pharynx. Consequently, different instrumentation, such as an intraluminal strain gauge probe, is needed for accurate manometric recording of pharyngeal peristalsis.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7152861     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-198211000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  16 in total

1.  The effect of an effortful swallow on the normal adult esophagus.

Authors:  Teresa E Lever; Kathleen T Cox; Donald Holbert; Mamun Shahrier; Monica Hough; Kristine Kelley-Salamon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  New technologies in the gastrointestinal clinic and research: impedance and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Pharyngeal peristaltic pressure variability, operational range, and functional reserve.

Authors:  Mark K Kern; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian; Patrick Sanvanson; Dilpesh Agrawal; Ashley Wuerl; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Physiological substrates of normal deglutition.

Authors:  J G Kennedy; R D Kent
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Normal pharyngoesophageal motility. A study of 50 healthy subjects.

Authors:  J A Wilson; A Pryde; A Cecilia; C C Macintyre; R C Heading
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  A fluid mechanical perspective on esophageal bolus transport.

Authors:  J G Brasseur
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Pressure-flow dynamics of the oral phase of swallowing.

Authors:  R Shaker; I J Cook; W J Dodds; W J Hogan
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 8.  The use of intraluminal manometry to assess upper esophageal sphincter function.

Authors:  B T Massey
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Simultaneous videoradiography and pharyngeal solid state manometry (videomanometry) in 25 nondysphagic volunteers.

Authors:  R Olsson; H Nilsson; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 10.  Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment.

Authors:  J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.