Literature DB >> 28254773

Pharyngeal peristaltic pressure variability, operational range, and functional reserve.

Mark K Kern1, Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian1, Patrick Sanvanson1, Dilpesh Agrawal1, Ashley Wuerl1, Reza Shaker2.   

Abstract

The present understanding of pharyngeal motor function remains incomplete. Among the remaining gaps of knowledge in this regard is the magnitude of variability of pharyngeal peristaltic pressure amplitude. Although variability can pose difficulty in interpretation of manometric findings, its magnitude can inform the operational range and reserve of the pharyngeal contractile function. We aimed to define the intra- and intersubject and intersession variability of select pharyngeal manometric parameters and, using this information, determine the number of swallow repetitions for acquiring reliable pharyngeal manometric data. We recorded pharyngeal peristalsis in 10 healthy subjects (age: 50 ± 25 yr, 5 women) by high-resolution manometry during two separate sessions of 20 sequences of 0.5-ml water swallows. Two-way ANOVA showed significant variation in the mean peak peristaltic pressure value across sites (P < 0.0001) as well as within the data at each site (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the pharyngeal contractile integral exhibited significant inter- (P = 0.003) and intrasubject (P < 0.001) variability. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test showed mixed results, in that some sites showed normally distributed data, whereas others did not. A robust Monte Carlo simulation showed that the nominal sample size was different for various tested metrics. For a power of 0.8, commonly accepted as an adequate threshold for acceptable statistical power, the optimal sample size for various peristaltic parameters ranged between 3 and 15. There is significant intra- and intersubject variability in site-specific and integrated parameters of pharyngeal peristalsis. The observed variance indicates a significant operational range and reserve in pharyngeal contractile function while necessitating parameter-specific sample size for reliable results.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Intra- and intersubject variability are significant and different at various sites within the contractile pharynx. In addition, significant swallow-to-swallow and subject-to-subject variability exists in pharyngeal contractile integral. The range of intrasubject variability indicates the existence of broad operational range and reserve. Lastly, our variability studies informed Monte Carlo and power analyses, yielding estimates of sample size that would ensure accurate representation of pressure metric variability.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dysphagia; estimated optimal sample size for pharyngeal pressure metrics; high-resolution pharyngeal manometry; swallowing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28254773      PMCID: PMC5451558          DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00382.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol        ISSN: 0193-1857            Impact factor:   4.052


  16 in total

1.  High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallow pressure events associated with head turn and chin tuck.

Authors:  Timothy M McCulloch; Matthew R Hoffman; Michelle R Ciucci
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Automated calculation of the distal contractile integral in esophageal pressure topography with a region-growing algorithm.

Authors:  Z Lin; S Roman; J E Pandolfino; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallow pressure events associated with effortful swallow and the Mendelsohn maneuver.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Jason D Mielens; Michelle R Ciucci; Corinne A Jones; Jack J Jiang; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Effects of laryngeal restriction on pharyngeal peristalsis and biomechanics: Clinical implications.

Authors:  Reza Shaker; Patrick Sanvanson; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian; Mark Kern; Ashley Wuerl; Allison Hyngstrom
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  The effect of bolus consistency on swallowing function measured by high-resolution manometry in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Yue Lan; Guang-Qing Xu; Fan Yu; Tuo Lin; Li-Sheng Jiang; Feng Liu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Effect of aging and bolus variables on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter motor function.

Authors:  R Shaker; J Ren; B Podvrsan; W J Dodds; W J Hogan; M Kern; R Hoffmann; J Hintz
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-03

7.  Effect of aging, position, and temperature on the threshold volume triggering pharyngeal swallows.

Authors:  R Shaker; J Ren; Z Zamir; A Sarna; J Liu; Z Sui
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Pharyngeal Pressure and Timing During Bolus Transit.

Authors:  Chelsea C Walczak; Corinne A Jones; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  A human model of restricted upper esophageal sphincter opening and its pharyngeal and UES deglutitive pressure phenomena.

Authors:  Hongmei Jiao; Ling Mei; Tarun Sharma; Mark Kern; Patrick Sanvanson; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.052

10.  Classification of high-resolution manometry data according to videofluoroscopic parameters using pattern recognition.

Authors:  Matthew R Hoffman; Corinne A Jones; Zhixian Geng; Suzan M Abelhalim; Chelsea C Walczak; Alyssa R Mitchell; Jack J Jiang; Timothy M McCulloch
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  3 in total

1.  Swallow strength training exercise for elderly: A health maintenance need.

Authors:  D Agrawal; M Kern; F Edeani; G Balasubramanian; A Hyngstrom; P Sanvanson; R Shaker
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry and Impedance: Protocols and Metrics-Recommendations of a High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry International Working Group.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Michelle Ciucci; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Ester Hernández; Katherine Hutcheson; Corinne Jones; Julia Maclean; Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer; Emily Plowman; Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Nathalie Rommel; Ashli O'Rourke
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Defining pharyngeal contractile integral during high-resolution manometry in neonates: a neuromotor marker of pharyngeal vigor.

Authors:  Sudarshan R Jadcherla; Varsha Prabhakar; Kathryn A Hasenstab; Saira Nawaz; Jayajit Das; Mark Kern; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.756

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.