Literature DB >> 984763

Comparison of direct and standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures.

J E Johnson, J A Washington.   

Abstract

In an effort to determine the feasibility and accuracy of performing direct susceptibility tests from positive blood cultures, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), determined by the agar dilution method, of direct and standardized tests with seven antibiotics were compared. Results were analyzed as to the number of very major (change in MIC from susceptible in preliminary direct testing to resistant in final standardized testing), major (change in MIC from resistant to susceptible), and minor (change in MIC without change in interpretation) discrepancies. The results for gram-positive cocci and for gram-negative bacilli were 5, 6, and 82 of 162 strains tested and 3, 12, and 79 of 90 strains tested, respectively. Of the total number of susceptibility tests compared, major and very major discrepancies occurred in only 1 and 2.4% of instances with gram-positive and -negative isolates, respectively. The majority of discrepancies were noted with Staphylococcus epidermidis (four very major, five major), Klebsiella (two very major, four major), and Alcaligenes (five major). The antibiotics most often exhibiting discrepancies were penicillin, ampicillin, and cephalothin. The results indicate that preliminary susceptibility testing directly from positive blood culture bottles is generally both feasible and accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 984763      PMCID: PMC429722          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.10.2.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  5 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Effects of atmosphere of incubation and of routine subcultures on detection of bacteremia in vacuum blood culture bottles.

Authors:  J L Harkness; M Hall; D M Ilstrup; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of direct and standardized disk diffusion susceptibility testing of urine cultures.

Authors:  G E Hollick; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Effect of mixed cultures on antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Authors:  A Shahidi; P D Ellner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-11

5.  Rapid determination of antimicrobial susceptibility for urgent clinical situations.

Authors:  A L Barry; L J Joyce; A P Adams; E J Benner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.493

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli in blood cultures by an electrochemical method.

Authors:  A H Huang; J J Wu; Y M Weng; H C Ding; T C Chang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of broth microdilution susceptibility results for anaerobic organisms by use of a rapid direct colony inoculum.

Authors:  J I Mangels; L H Lindberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of direct and standard antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing for bacteria isolated from blood.

Authors:  S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  The Slow March toward Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Christopher D Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  "It Takes a Village": Mechanisms Underlying Antimicrobial Recalcitrance of Polymicrobial Biofilms.

Authors:  Giulia Orazi; George A O'Toole
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Inoculum preparation for anaerobic susceptibility tests.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from blood cultures by direct inoculation and early reading of disk diffusion tests.

Authors:  M B Coyle; L A McGonagle; J J Plorde; C R Clausen; F D Schoenknecht
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by two methods of inoculum preparation.

Authors:  A M Bourgault; F Lamothe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Clinical impact of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.

Authors:  G V Doern; D R Scott; A L Rashad
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.

Authors:  T E Kiehn; C Capitolo; D Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.