Literature DB >> 1267433

Unreliability of direct antibiotic susceptibility testing on wound exudates.

P D Ellner, E Johnson.   

Abstract

Direct susceptibility testing was performed on 110 specimens of wound exudates. Growth was inadequate in 76 of these specimens. Of the remaining 34 specimens, only 5 produced results corresponding to those obtained by testing individual bacterial isolates by the Kirby-Bauer technique. This study confirms that direct susceptibility testing of wound exudates may provide misleading and clinically unreliable information on more than 95% of specimens.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1267433      PMCID: PMC429528          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.9.2.355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  3 in total

1.  Editorial: Anaerobic infections: old myths and new realities.

Authors:  S L Gorbach; J G Bartlett
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Effect of mixed cultures on antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Authors:  A Shahidi; P D Ellner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-11

3.  Rapid determination of antimicrobial susceptibility for urgent clinical situations.

Authors:  A L Barry; L J Joyce; A P Adams; E J Benner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.493

  3 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of direct and standard antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing for bacteria isolated from blood.

Authors:  S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  "It Takes a Village": Mechanisms Underlying Antimicrobial Recalcitrance of Polymicrobial Biofilms.

Authors:  Giulia Orazi; George A O'Toole
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Comparison of direct and standard microtiter broth dilution susceptibility testing of blood culture isolates.

Authors:  T E Kiehn; C Capitolo; D Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid flow cytometric bacterial detection and determination of susceptibility to amikacin in body fluids and exudates.

Authors:  C Y Cohen; E Sahar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Direct susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on clinical samples: a rapid and accurate tool for antibiotic stewardship.

Authors:  L Coorevits; J Boelens; G Claeys
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Increases the Sensitivity of Biofilm-Grown Staphylococcus aureus to Membrane-Targeting Antiseptics and Antibiotics.

Authors:  Giulia Orazi; Kathryn L Ruoff; George A O'Toole
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 7.867

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.