Literature DB >> 7096231

An analysis of some variables influencing the effectiveness of reprimands.

R Van Houten, P A Nau, S E MacKenzie-Keating, D Sameoto, B Colavecchia.   

Abstract

Although several studies have shown that social reprimands can function as punishers, no study reported to data has isolated any of the factors influencing reprimand efficacy. Three experiments were conducted to investigate several factors. Experiment 1 used an alternating treatments design and was conducted on two elementary school boys, one of whom was in a special education class. Results showed that verbal reprimands delivered with eye contact and firm grasp of the student's shoulders reduced disruptive behavior to a greater extent than did verbal reprimands delivered without eye contact and grasp. Both types of reprimand were more effective than a baseline condition during which disruptive behavior was ignored. Experiment 2 also used an alternating treatments design and was conducted on one elementary school boy. Results demonstrated that reprimands delivered from one meter away were considerably more effective than reprimands delivered from seven meters away. Experiment 3 used a reversal design and was conducted on two pairs of elementary school children, one a pair of boys and the other a pair of girls. Results demonstrated that reprimands delivered to just one member of the pair reduced the disruptive behavior of both members of the pair. Thus, the effects of reprimands "spilled" over to nonreprimanded students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7096231      PMCID: PMC1308248          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  14 in total

1.  The use of prompts to enhance vicarious effects of nonverbal approval.

Authors:  A E Kazdin; N A Silverman; J L Sittler
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1975

2.  The effects of social punishment on noncompliance: a comparison with timeout and positive practice.

Authors:  D M Doleys; K C Wells; S A Hobbs; M W Roberts; L M Cartelli
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1976 WINTER

3.  Natural rates of teacher approval and disapproval in grade-7 classrooms.

Authors:  J D Thomas; I E Presland; M D Grant; T L Glynn
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1978

4.  Natural rates of teacher approval and disapproval in the classroom.

Authors:  M A White
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1975

5.  The training and validation of youth-preferred social behaviors of child-care personnel.

Authors:  A G Willner; C J Braukmann; K A Kirigin; D L Fixsen; E L Phillips; M M Wolf
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

6.  Economic and biological influences on a pigeon's key peck.

Authors:  L Green; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Production and elimination of disruptive classroom behavior by systematically varying teacher's behavior.

Authors:  D R Thomas; W C Becker; M Armstrong
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

9.  The effects of loud and soft reprimands on the behavior of disruptive students.

Authors:  K D O'Leary; K F Kaufman; R E Kass; R S Drabman
Journal:  Except Child       Date:  1970-10

10.  Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject.

Authors:  D H Barlow; S C Hayes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1979
View more
  11 in total

1.  Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement: some reciprocal relations between basic and applied research.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Interaction effects in multielement designs: inevitable, desirable, and ignorable.

Authors:  A H Hains; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1989

3.  Descriptive analyses of caregiver reprimands.

Authors:  Kimberly N Sloman; Timothy R Vollmer; Nicole M Cotnoir; Carrie S W Borrero; John C Borrero; Andrew L Samaha; Claire C St Peter
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

4.  Feedback interventions and driving speed: A parametric and comparative analysis.

Authors:  R V Houten; P A Nau
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1983

5.  An analysis of several variables influencing the efficacy of flash card instruction.

Authors:  R V Houten; A Rolider
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1989

6.  The efficacy of all-positive management as a function of the prior use of negative consequences.

Authors:  L J Pfiffner; S G O'leary
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1987

7.  Effects of reprimands and praise on appropriate behavior in the classroom.

Authors:  M M Acker; S G O'Leary
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1987-12

8.  The importance of prudent negative consequences for maintaining the appropriate behavior of hyperactive students.

Authors:  L A Rosén; S G O'Leary; S A Joyce; G Conway; L J Pfiffner
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1984-12

9.  The efficacy of an all-positive approach to classroom management.

Authors:  L J Pfiffner; L A Rosén; S G O'Leary
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

Review 10.  The effect of praise, positive nonverbal response, reprimand, and negative nonverbal response on child compliance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniela J Owen; Amy M S Slep; Richard E Heyman
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.