Literature DB >> 16811832

Economic and biological influences on a pigeon's key peck.

L Green, H Rachlin.   

Abstract

Pigeons were studied in a two-component multiple schedule. In the first phase of the experiment, key pecks were reinforced on a variable-interval 2-min schedule in both components and free food was delivered additionally during one component. When components alternated every 8 sec, all pigeons pecked at a much higher rate during the component with free food than during the other component. At a component duration of 16 min, the reverse was true: all pigeons pecked at a higher rate during the component without free food. In the second phase, the additional food during one component was made contingent on pecking. Responding during the component without the extra food remained essentially unchanged, as expected, since rate of reinforcement remained identical to that in the previous phase. However, rate of responding during the component with the extra food (now contingent on pecking) was elevated, compared to the rate in the first phase, and did not show the marked decline as component duration was increased.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811832      PMCID: PMC1333319          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Failure to obtain positive contrast when pigeons press a bar.

Authors:  R F Westbrook
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter?

Authors:  H Rachlin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Conditioned acceleration and conditioned suppression in pigeons.

Authors:  H Leitenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  15 in total

1.  Economic and biological influences on key pecking and treadle pressing in pigeons.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Daniel D Holt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Diminishing marginal value as delay discounting.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Positive conditioned suppression: an explanation in terms of multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; J E Hughes; S L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The matching law in and within groups of rats.

Authors:  D A Graft; S E Lea; T L Whitworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of concurrent response-independent reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance.

Authors:  K A Lattal; A J Bryan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.

Authors:  R D Spealman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Behavioral economics (Editorial).

Authors:  W K Bickel; L Green; R E Vuchinich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Within-trial contrast: pigeons prefer conditioned reinforcers that follow a relatively more rather than a less aversive event.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Rebecca A Singer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.