Literature DB >> 7091519

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

C F Frey, E J Burbige, W B Meinke, T G Pullos, H N Wong, D M Hickman, J Belber.   

Abstract

The ERCP report in the patient's chart was compared with findings on common duct exploration or cystic duct cholangiography in 72 patients and found to have a sensitivity of 90.4 percent, a specificity of 98 percent, and an accuracy of 95.8 percent. Factors having the potential to influence the accuracy of ERCP were errors in interpretation by the surgeon and the radiologist and the operative technique of cholecystectomy. Also, the interval between the performance of the procedure and operation was particularly important in the patient with multiple small gallstones or small common duct stones. Small gallstones may spontaneously pass from the gallbladder to the common duct, or small common duct stones may spontaneously pass into the duodenum; therefore, the longer the interval between ERCP and operation, the greater the likelihood of a discrepancy. At operation, gallstones may be squeezed into the common duct during manipulation of the gallbladder unless the cystic duct is obstructed before manipulation of the gallbladder. We found ERCP sufficiently accurate to make cystic duct cholangiography unnecessary in most patients with cholelithiasis having a preoperative ERCP examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7091519     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90610-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Common bile duct stones - their presentation, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Rajendra Desai; Bahaman N Shokouhi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  A radio-anatomical study in vivo on pancreatic ducts.

Authors:  E Darnis; P Cronier; P Mercier; P Moreau; J Pillet; J Boyer
Journal:  Anat Clin       Date:  1984

4.  Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ming-Hsun Yang; Tien-Hua Chen; Shin-E Wang; Yi-Fang Tsai; Cheng-Hsi Su; Chew-Wun Wu; Wing-Yiu Lui; Yi-Ming Shyr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for assessment of malignant biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Jae Young Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Ki Whang Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Advances in Risk Factors for Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones.

Authors:  Yao Wu; Chen Jing Xu; Shun Fu Xu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Choledocholithiasis diagnostics - endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Authors:  Jarosław Leszczyszyn
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2014-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.