Literature DB >> 18236046

Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for assessment of malignant biliary obstruction.

Jin-Young Choi1, Myeong-Jin Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Jae Young Lee, Se Hyung Kim, Ki Whang Kim, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

The purpose was to retrospectively compare two-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) including breath-hold single-shot rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and multislice half-Fourier RARE versus navigator-triggered 3D-RARE MRC in the evaluation of biliary malignancy. MRC findings were evaluated in 31 patients with malignant biliary obstruction, including biliary malignancy, gallbladder carcinoma, and ampullary cancer. Two observers independently reviewed the images to assess the overall image quality, artifacts, ductal conspicuity, extent of disease, diagnostic confidence of tumor extent, and origin of tumor. The results were compared with surgical and histopathologic findings. Studies obtained with 3D-MRC were of significantly higher technical quality than those obtained with 2D-MRC. However, the accuracy between two sequences for classification of tumor showed no statistical significance. There was no significant difference between the Az values of 2D- and 3D-MRC for overall tumor extent in bilateral second order branch, intrapancreatic common bile duct (CBD) involvement (Az = 0.889, 0.881 for 2D and Az = 0.903, 0.864 for 3D). Nor was there a significant difference between two sequences in the assessment of the origin of tumor. Although 3D-MRC has superior image quality over 2D-MRC, 3D-MRC showed no statistically significant difference in accuracy compared with 2D-MRC for evaluating the extent of disease in malignant biliary obstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18236046     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0670-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences.

Authors:  J A Soto; M A Barish; O Alvarez; S Medina
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  R Schöfl
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  R E Hintze; A Adler; W Veltzke; H Abou-Rebyeh; R Hammerstingl; T Vogl; R Felix
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques.

Authors:  Aaron Sodickson; Koenraad J Mortele; Matthew A Barish; Kelly H Zou; Steven Thibodeau; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  L H Schwartz; F V Coakley; Y Sun; L H Blumgart; Y Fong; D M Panicek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  F V Coakley; L H Schwartz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner; G W Capps; A M Zfass; K M Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Complications of ERCP: a prospective study.

Authors:  Merete Christensen; Peter Matzen; Svend Schulze; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  C F Frey; E J Burbige; W B Meinke; T G Pullos; H N Wong; D M Hickman; J Belber
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  J A Soto; M A Barish; E K Yucel; D Siegenberg; J T Ferrucci; R Chuttani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  9 in total

1.  Differentiation of noncalculous periampullary obstruction: comparison of CT with negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography versus MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Bin Li; Lei Zhang; Zhui-Yang Zhang; Jian-Ming Ni; Feng-qi Lu; Wen-Juan Wu; Chun-juan Jiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary pathology.

Authors:  S Palmucci; L A Mauro; S La Scola; S Incarbone; G Bonanno; P Milone; A Russo; G C Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance evaluations of biliary malignancy and condition at high-risk for biliary malignancy: Current status.

Authors:  Reiji Sugita
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2013-12-27

4.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Authors:  Kefu Liu; Ping Xie; Weijun Peng; Zhengrong Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Comparison of different magnetic resonance cholangiography techniques in living liver donors including Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted sequences.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Verena Steinweg; Stefan Maderwald; Arnold Radtke; Georgios Sotiropoulos; Michael Forsting; Tobias Schroeder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Clinical Evaluation of Respiratory-triggered 3D MRCP with Navigator Echoes Compared to Breath-hold Acquisition Using Compressed Sensing and/or Parallel Imaging.

Authors:  Marie-Luise Kromrey; Satoshi Funayama; Daiki Tamada; Shintaro Ichikawa; Tatsuya Shimizu; Hiroshi Onishi; Utaroh Motosugi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 7.  Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Bohyun Kim; Eun Sun Lee; Hyoung Jung Kim; Ji Hye Min; Jeong Min Lee; Moon Hyung Choi; Nieun Seo; Sang Hyun Choi; Seong Hyun Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Yang Shin Park; Yong Eun Chung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Three-dimensional imaging for hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases: Emphasis on clinical utility.

Authors:  Soo Jin Kim; Byung Ihn Choi; Se Hyung Kim; Jae Young Lee
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009-02

Review 9.  State-of-the-art cross-sectional liver imaging: beyond lesion detection and characterization.

Authors:  Gustavo Felipe Luersen; Priya Bhosale; Janio Szklaruk
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2015-07-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.